Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36459503›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Stability and learning in excitatory synapses by nonlinear inhibitory plasticity.

Christoph Miehl, Julijana Gjorgjieva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cell-Type-Specific Synaptic Scaling Mechanisms Differentially Contribute to Associative Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Homeostatic Plasticity Enables Stable yet Tunable Neuronal Assemblies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Modular inhibitory coding in binary networks.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Synapse-type-specific competitive Hebbian learning forms functional recurrent networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Enhancement of Motor Learning and Corticospinal Excitability: The Role of Electroacupuncture and Motor Training in Healthy Volunteers.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Artificial sensory system based on memristive devices.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christoph MiehlMax Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9094-2760
Julijana GjorgjievaMax Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7118-4079

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003016 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON, WORRALL, BRADFORD B · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
Computational Characterization of Environmental EnteropathyK23DK117061 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SYED, SANA · 2019 to 2023
$964k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK117061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic changes are hypothesized to underlie learning and memory formation in the brain. But Hebbian synaptic plasticity of excitatory synapses on its own is unstable, leading to either unlimited growth of synaptic strengths or silencing of neuronal activity without additional homeostatic mechanisms. To control excitatory synaptic strengths, we propose a novel form of synaptic plasticity at inhibitory synapses. Using computational modeling, we suggest two key features of inhibitory plasticity, dominance of inhibition over excitation and a nonlinear dependence on the firing rate of postsynaptic excitatory neurons whereby inhibitory synaptic strengths change with the same sign (potentiate or depress) as excitatory synaptic strengths. We demonstrate that the stable synaptic strengths realized by this novel inhibitory plasticity model affects excitatory/inhibitory weight ratios in agreement with experimental results. Applying a disinhibitory signal can gate plasticity and lead to the generation of receptive fields and strong bidirectional connectivity in a recurrent network. Hence, a novel form of nonlinear inhibitory plasticity can simultaneously stabilize excitatory synaptic strengths and enable learning upon disinhibition.

Indexed as

LearningNeuronal PlasticityBrainInhibition, PsychologicalSynapses

Identifiers

PMID36459503
PMCPMC9718420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.