ReviewCurrent urology reports2022
A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?
Review in Current urology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective Mentorship in Urology Fellowship Training: Qualities, Models, and Equity.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Mentorship in Iran's perioperative nursing training: a systematic scoping review and evidence appraisal based on the standards of the Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Strategies and Best Practices for Engaging Urology Residents in Clinical Research during Training.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Important Concepts in Building a Positive Culture in a Residency Program.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical Education: Best Practices and Future Directions.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Support for the Struggling Learner in Urology.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Mentorship in surgical training; a systematic scoping review to inform a mentorship framework for ophthalmology trainees.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The Role of Mentorship in Orthopedic Professional Development: From Training to Mastery.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Voices of change: experiences of early women urology residents - a single institution qualitative research study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Facilitating a More Diverse Workforce: The Value of Mentorship in Cardiothoracic Surgery.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024Article
- The skills and experiences needed to enhance fellowship training in reproductive urology.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Bridging the Gap from Classroom to Clerkship to Career: Informal Surgical Mentorship for Pre-Clerkship Medical Students.Kansas journal of medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo evaluate the state of mentorship in the field of urology. RECENT
findingsMentorship has been shown to decrease burnout, increase recruitment of underrepresented minority groups, and have a positive influence on the career trajectory of mentees. Approximately half of surgical residency programs have mentorship programs. The current literature supports the idea that formal mentorship programs are successful based on level 1 satisfaction scores. However, studies are sparse and of low quality. Mentorship program success is rarely objectively measured. Structured mentorship programs appear to be beneficial, but require serious planning, evaluation, and ongoing support without which the programs can fail. Future research should be focused on objective and measurable metrics of success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.