Observational studyJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2023
CRT-D replacement strategy: results of the BioCONTINUE study.
Observational study in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02323503 (BIOtronik Study to Assess the CONTINUation of Existing Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias After CRT-D Replacement for Patients With Primary Prevention Indication), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
BIOtronik Study to Assess the CONTINUation of Existing Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias After CRT-D Replacement for Patients With Primary Prevention Indication
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrical Storm Induced by Cardiac Resynchronization: Efficacy of the Multipoint Pacing Stimulation.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-P at time of generator replacement: a true clinical conundrum or just an academic debate?Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023Article
- Follow-up of CRT-D patients downgraded to CRT-P at the time of generator exchange.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds), the need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) back-up may be questionable at time of CRT-D replacement (REP) if ICD implant criteria are no longer met due to an improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and if no major ventricular arrhythmic event (VAE) occurred during the CRT-D lifetime. The aim of our study was to assess the relevance of ICD back-up and predictors of VAE after REP in primary prevention CRT-D patients.
methodsThe prospective, observational, international BioCONTINUE study investigated the rate of patients with at least 1 sustained VAE (sVAE) post-REP and searched for predictive factors of sVAE.
resultsTwo hundred seventy-six patients (70 ± 10 years, 77% men, mean LVEF 40.6 ± 12.6%) were followed for 28.4 ± 10.2 months. The rate of patients with sVAE was 8.3%, 10.3%, and 21.2% at 1, 2, and 4 years post-REP. Patients without persistent ICD indication at REP still had a sVAE rate of 5.7% (95% CI 2.3-11.5%) at 2 years. In multivariate analysis, predictive factors of subsequent sVAE were (i) persistent ICD indication (hazard ratio (HR) 3.6; 95% CI 1.6-8.3; p = 0.003); (ii) 64-72 years of age as compared to ≥ 79 years (HR 3.7; 95% CI 1.4-9.7; p = 0.008); and (iii) ischemic heart disease (HR 4.4; 95% CI 2.1-9.3; p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe risk of sVAE (21.2% at 4 years post-REP) depends on age, ischemic heart disease, and ICD indication at the time of REP. A non-trivial risk of sVAE remains in patients without persistent ICD indication. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT02323503.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36459310What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.