ArticleEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2022
A simple and automated method for
Article in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revealing the selectivity source of di-2-ethylhexyl-phosphoric acid for trivalent Gd, Tb, and Dy separation.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Practical Aspects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiolabeling efficiency of FENTA chelators and stability of their terbium-161, lutetium-177 and bismuth-213 complexes.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026Article
- Contemporary opportunities and potential of Auger electron-emitting theranostics.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Quantitative SPECT imaging ofEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Terbium sisters: current development status and upscaling opportunities.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024Review
- Terbium radionuclides for theranostic applications in nuclear medicine: from atom to bedside.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Preclinical Evaluation of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Highlight selection of radiochemistry and radiopharmacy developments by editorial board.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background
resultsWe first tested the distribution coefficients on TK211 and TK212 resins for the separation of Gd, Tb, and Dy, and subsequently developed a method to separate these metal ions, with an additional TK221 resin to concentrate the final product. A side-by-side comparison of the products purified using this new method with the HPIC method was undertaken, assessing the radionuclidic purity, chemical purity regarding Gd and Dy, and labeling efficiency with a standard chelate (DOTA) and a novel chelate (crown). The two methods have comparable radionuclidic purity and labeling efficiency. The small SPE column method reduced Gd content to nanogram level, although still higher than the HPIC method. An ICP-MS method to quantify
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.