ReviewCurrent microbiology2022
Biotic Interactions in Soil are Underestimated Drivers of Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency.
Review in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species-specific glucose mineralization in artificial soil: insights fromMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Interactions Between Root Traits and Fungal Functional Guilds Across the Root Economics Spectrum.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics mediate primary metabolism and shape diverse species interactions among coevolved soil Streptomyces.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage impacts soil chemical properties and medicinal quality inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbial community assembly in the fermentation of cigar tobacco leaves.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Microbial niches at the One Health interface: linking environmental factors, biomes, and disease dynamics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Functional Changes of Rhizosphere and Non-Rhizosphere Soils Under the Decline ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Metagenomic and Metabolomic Perspectives on the Drought Tolerance of Broomcorn Millet (Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Dynamics of bacterial growth, and life-history tradeoffs, explain differences in soil carbon cycling due to land-use.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Who is who in necromass formation and stabilization in soil? The role of fungi and bacteria as complementary players of biogeochemical functioning.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Plant diversity drives positive microbial associations in the rhizosphere enhancing carbon use efficiency in agricultural soils.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Emerging multiscale insights on microbial carbon use efficiency in the land carbon cycle.Nature communications · 2024Review
- Diverse bacterial consortia: key drivers of rhizosoil fertility modulating microbiome functions, plant physiology, nutrition, and soybean grain yield.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Differences in soil physicochemical properties and rhizosphere microbial communities of flue-cured tobacco at different transplantation stages and locations.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE)-the balance between microbial growth and respiration-strongly impacts microbial mediated soil carbon storage and is sensitive to many well-studied abiotic environmental factors. However, surprisingly, little work has examined how biotic interactions in soil may impact CUE. Here, we review the theoretical and empirical lines of evidence exploring how biotic interactions affect CUE through the lens of life history strategies. Fundamentally, the CUE of a microbial population is constrained by population density and carrying capacity, which, when reached, causes species to grow more quickly and less efficiently. When microbes engage in interspecific competition, they accelerate growth rates to acquire limited resources and release secondary chemicals toxic to competitors. Such processes are not anabolic and thus constrain CUE. In turn, antagonists may activate one of a number of stress responses that also do not involve biomass production, potentially further reducing CUE. In contrast, facilitation can increase CUE by expanding species realized niches, mitigating environmental stress and reducing production costs of extracellular enzymes. Microbial interactions at higher trophic levels also influence CUE. For instance, predation on microbes can positively or negatively impact CUE by changing microbial density and the outcomes of interspecific competition. Finally, we discuss how plants select for more or less efficient microbes under different contexts. In short, this review demonstrates the potential for biotic interactions to be a strong regulator of microbial CUE and additionally provides a blueprint for future research to address key knowledge gaps of ecological and applied importance for carbon sequestration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.