Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36459292›Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2022

Biotic Interactions in Soil are Underestimated Drivers of Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency.

Hélène Iven, Tom W N Walker, Mark Anthony

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbial community assembly in the fermentation of cigar tobacco leaves.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hélène IvenDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland. helene.iven@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6691-0635
Tom W N WalkerInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8095-6026
Mark AnthonyDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-6255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE)-the balance between microbial growth and respiration-strongly impacts microbial mediated soil carbon storage and is sensitive to many well-studied abiotic environmental factors. However, surprisingly, little work has examined how biotic interactions in soil may impact CUE. Here, we review the theoretical and empirical lines of evidence exploring how biotic interactions affect CUE through the lens of life history strategies. Fundamentally, the CUE of a microbial population is constrained by population density and carrying capacity, which, when reached, causes species to grow more quickly and less efficiently. When microbes engage in interspecific competition, they accelerate growth rates to acquire limited resources and release secondary chemicals toxic to competitors. Such processes are not anabolic and thus constrain CUE. In turn, antagonists may activate one of a number of stress responses that also do not involve biomass production, potentially further reducing CUE. In contrast, facilitation can increase CUE by expanding species realized niches, mitigating environmental stress and reducing production costs of extracellular enzymes. Microbial interactions at higher trophic levels also influence CUE. For instance, predation on microbes can positively or negatively impact CUE by changing microbial density and the outcomes of interspecific competition. Finally, we discuss how plants select for more or less efficient microbes under different contexts. In short, this review demonstrates the potential for biotic interactions to be a strong regulator of microbial CUE and additionally provides a blueprint for future research to address key knowledge gaps of ecological and applied importance for carbon sequestration.

Indexed as

CarbonSoilBiomassMicrobial InteractionsCarbonSoil

Identifiers

PMID36459292
PMCPMC9718865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.