ArticleJournal of religion and health2023
The CREATION Health Assessment Tool for Patients (CHAT-P): Development & Psychometric Testing.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring Whole Person Health: A Scoping Review.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CREATION Model is a whole-person wellness model facilitating patient-provider partnerships for health promotion. CREATION is an acronym that represents eight whole-person health principles: Choice, Rest, Environment-Interpersonal Relationships, Activity, Trust, Outlook, and Nutrition, all focusing on the relationship between individual choice and physical, psychological, social, and spiritual health. This study develops and tests the psychometric properties of the CREATION Health Assessment Tool for Patients (CHAT-P). A 125-item-bank using a 5-point Likert scale with 1 to 5 rating was generated through focus-groups of clinicians, patients, and healthcare leaders. An expert panel assessed content adequacy, reducing items to 82. Patient survey data (n = 599) from 15 inpatient medical units were randomly divided into two datasets. Exploratory Factor Analysis applied to Dataset 1 resulted in a 7-factor (Choice/Rest/Environment-Interpersonal Relationships/Activity/Trust/Outlook/Nutrition) and 28-item tool with factor loading 0.47-0.86. The model structure was confirmed by Structural Equation Modeling on Dataset 2 with goodness-of-fit test results: X
Indexed as
Identifiers
36459253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.