Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36459242›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2023

Assessment of fluid status in neonatal dialysis: the need for new tools.

Noureddin Nourbakhsh, Nadine Benador

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noureddin NourbakhshPediatric Nephrology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Nadine BenadorPediatric Nephrology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. nbenador@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-103X
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of fluid status in neonatal dialysis has largely focused on traditional tools including clinical assessment, serial weights, and blood pressure (BP) measurements. However, in infants on kidney replacement therapy, the assessment of fluid overload is problematic due to errors in weight assessment, subtlety of physical exam findings, and inaccuracy of non-invasive BP measurements. In this presentation of a neonate with bilateral renal agenesis requiring kidney replacement therapy, the treating team assessed a number of variables in determining the ultrafiltration prescription for dialysis across 2 modalities (hemodialysis and continuous kidney replacement therapy). COMPLICATIONS: Fluid overload, cardiomegaly, and worsened respiratory status occurred when attempting to assess the neonate's fluid status by traditional markers (weights, blood pressures, physical exam findings). B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was obtained and was noted to correlate with the degree of fluid overload. KEY MANAGEMENT POINTS: Compared to traditional tools for assessment of fluid status in pediatric dialysis, BNP assisted the medical team in optimizing the volume status of the subject and determining optimal daily ultrafiltration goals. Due to the rapid release in response to myocardial stretch and the lack of kidney clearance of the peptide, BNP may represent an objective, timely, and reliable index of volume status in the pediatric dialysis patient.

Indexed as

Heart FailureKidney Failure, ChronicBlood PressureChildHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNatriuretic Peptide, BrainRenal DialysisRenal Replacement TherapyNatriuretic Peptide, BrainChildrenDialysisFluid balanceFluid overloadHypertensionPediatric

Identifiers

PMID36459242
PMCPMC9925496
OpenAlexW4310603928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.