ArticleJAMA network open2022
Comparison of Uptake and Prices of Biosimilars in the US, Germany, and Switzerland.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Development, Regulatory, and Reimbursement Review Duration of New Drugs in the US and European Countries.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Short-term treatment outcomes of the ranibizumab biosimilar CKD-701 for vitreous hemorrhage secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of aflibercept biosimilars compared to aflibercept in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Evolution of Approaches to the Development, Life Cycle Control, and Interchangeability of Veterinary Biosimilars Based on Hemoproteins (with a Focus on Cytochrome C).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems in urologic oncology: From targeted therapy to precision theranostics.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Biologic Drug Prices in Medicare Part B After Entry of Biosimilars to the Market.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of biologics market dynamics in 12 countries: (Bio)similar and sustainability.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Generic competition and price developments in the USA, Germany and Switzerland (2007-2023): a longitudinal observational study.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Uptake of biosimilars in China: a retrospective analysis of the case of trastuzumab from 2018 to 2023.Global health research and policy · 2024Article
- Drug Prices After Patent Expirations in High-Income Countries and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Use of Track One Prioritized Examination for Pharmaceutical Patents.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Biosimilar underutilization alone does not foretell a broken biologics market.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Paucity of intellectual property rights information in the US biologics system a decade after passage of the Biosimilars Act.PLoS medicine · 2024Article
- A novel gene signature related to fatty acid metabolism predicts prognosis, immune landscape, and drug sensitivity in early-stage lung squamous cell carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Anti-TNFα in inflammatory bowel disease: from originators to biosimilars.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Assessment of clinical benefit, cost and uptake of biosimilars versus reference biologics in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Reduction of biologic pricing following biosimilar introduction: Analysis across 57 countries and regions, 2012-19.PloS one · 2024Article
- Knowledge and attitudes of German and Swiss community pharmacists towards biologicals and biosimilars - a prospective survey before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Biosimilars engage in low levels of direct-to-physician marketing relative to reference biologics.Health affairs scholar · 2023Article
- Comparative price analysis of biological medicines: disparities generated by different pricing policies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Biologics account for a substantial proportion of health care expenditures. Their costs have been projected to reach US $452 billion in global spending by 2022. Given recent expiration of patent protection of biologics, a shift toward greater follow-on competition among biosimilars would be expected that would allow greater uptake and lower drug costs. Objective: To assess uptake and prices of biosimilars in the US compared with 2 European countries (Germany and Switzerland) with national mechanisms for drug price negotiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, biologics and biosimilars that were approved in the US, Germany, and Switzerland until August 2020 were identified. Prices and sales data were extracted from public and commercial databases for the years 2011 to 2020. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Descriptive statistics were used to show temporal trends in the uptake of biosimilars and relative prices compared with those of reference products (ie, biologic agents) for each country. Descriptive analysis was also performed to compare the uptake of biosimilars between the 3 countries limited to biologics that have biosimilars on the market in all countries. To test if biosimilar awareness in each country increased over the last decade, a linear least squares regression was applied. Results: The study cohort included 15 biosimilars and 6 biologics for the US, 52 biosimilars and 15 biologics for Germany, and 28 biosimilars and 13 biologics for Switzerland. Uptake of biosimilars increased over time in all countries. On average, the biosimilar market share at launch was highest in Germany; however, it increased at the fastest rate in the US. Monthly treatment costs of biosimilars in the US were a median of 1.94 (IQR, 1.78-2.44) and 2.74 (IQR, 1.91-3.46) higher than corresponding costs in Germany and Switzerland, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that more biosimilars have been marketed in Germany and Switzerland than in the US. Policies that counter anticompetitive practices in the US could allow biosimilars to enter the market sooner and could also lower health care costs with improved access. Awareness of biosimilars should be promoted to increase uptake of biosimilars globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.