Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458667›Full record

Trial reportAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2022

Efficacy of type-I and type-II pectoral nerve blocks (PECS I and II) in patients undergoing mastectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Fabricio Tavares Mendonça, Antonio de Assis Feitosa Junior, Huana Nogueira, Heloisa Roncolato, Catia Sousa Goveia

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The MECDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabricio Tavares MendonçaTeaching and Training Centre in Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Antonio de Assis Feitosa JuniorTeaching and Training Centre in Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Huana NogueiraTeaching and Training Centre in Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Heloisa RoncolatoTeaching and Training Centre in Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Catia Sousa GoveiaUniversity of Brasília, Anaesthesiology Centre, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Hospital de Base · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe benefits of type I/II pectoral nerve blocks (PECS I/II), which can be dose dependent, have been examined in different studies. Nonetheless, few randomised trials have been performed in South America. The present randomised trial examined the efficacy of PECS I/II with a higher dose of the local anaesthetic to manage perioperative pain after mastectomy in Brazil. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a randomised, parallel, single-centre, and single-blind trial. Eighty participants undergoing elective mastectomy were randomised (1 : 1) to receive PECS I/II plus ultrasound-guided ropivacaine (0.5%) or standard general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery, assessed with a numerical rating scale. Haemodynamic outcomes, consumption of opioids, anaesthe-tics and antiemetics, and post-anaesthetic recovery times were also recorded.

resultsSixty participants (75%) completed the study. The mean age was 54 years, with 57% of participants undergoing mastectomy and 43% undergoing quadrantectomy. Median pain intensity (interquartile range) at rest (24 h postoperatively) was lower in the PECS I/II group compared to the control group: 0 (0-1.75) vs. 1 (1-2), P = 0.021. A smaller number of patients in the PECS I/II group required intraoperative fentanyl (23.3% vs. 83.3%; P < 0.001) and postoperative tramadol (20.0 vs. 76.7%; P < 0.001). Mean doses of fentanyl and tramadol were about 4-5 times lower in the PECS I/II group (P < 0.001). PECS I/II significantly reduced sevoflurane consumption during surgery (P = 0.01). No difference was observed regarding adverse effects.

conclusionsPECS I/II blockade with high-dose local anaesthetic is efficacious and safe, resulting in lower levels of perioperative pain after mastectomy compared to standard general anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsThoracic NervesTramadolAnesthetics, LocalFemaleFentanylHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedPainProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodAnesthetics, LocalFentanylTramadollocal anaestheticsmastectomyperipheral nerve blockpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID36458667
PMCPMC10156554
OpenAlexW4310705765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.