Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458395›Full record

SynthesisJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies of bisphosphonates and denosumab in multiple myeloma and future perspectives.

Vasiliki Chatziravdeli, Georgios N Katsaras, Dimitrios Katsaras, Chrysoula Doxani, Ioannis Stefanidis, Elias Zintzaras

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasiliki ChatziravdeliLaboratory of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece.
Georgios N KatsarasLaboratory of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece.
Dimitrios KatsarasLaboratory of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece.
Chrysoula DoxaniLaboratory of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece.
Ioannis StefanidisLaboratory of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece.
Elias ZintzarasLaboratory of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece.
University of Thessaly · GRBlackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBPapageorgiou General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab (DENOS), due to their ability to inhibit osteoclast activity, are used to prevent skeletal complications in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The NCBI PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, were systematically searched for interventional studies, assessing the use of BP and DENOS in MM patients. Overall survival, disease progression, skeletal-related events, bone pain, osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and renal toxicity were the outcomes of interest. A total of 993 studies were retrieved and 43 were used for qualitative synthesis. Clodronate (CLOD) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) were effective in reducing skeletal complications compared to placebo. Results are mixed regarding the efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal related events. ONJ rates were higher for ZOL, but under 5%, with CLOD having the safest profile. DENOS demonstrated non-inferiority to ZOL, in improving overall survival [pooled Hazard Ratio(HR) 1.02(95% CI 0.72,1.44)], progression free survival [pooled HR 0.92(95% CI 0.76,1.11)] and in reducing skeletal related events [pooled HR 1.03(95% CI 0.92,1.16)], with similar rates of ONJ and better safety profile regarding renal toxicity. Denosumab has comparable efficacy and safety with ZOL and may even replace BPs in the future, in the management of myeloma bone disease.

Indexed as

DiphosphonatesMultiple MyelomaClodronic AcidDenosumabHumansZoledronic AcidClodronic AcidDenosumabDiphosphonatesZoledronic AcidBisphosphonateDenosumabEfficacyMultiple MyelomaSkeletal Events

Identifiers

PMID36458395
PMCPMC9716295
OpenAlexW4311292353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.