Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458329›Full record

ArticleChild development2023

Talking to talkers: Infants' talk status, but not their gender, is related to language input.

Shannon Dailey, Elika Bergelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Theoretical and Methodological Insights From Five Transcribed and Annotated Daylong Audio Recordings of Young Children's Language Environments.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shaping linguistic input in parent-infant interactions: The influence of the Infant's temperament.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shannon DaileyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0500-0371
Elika BergelsonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-4797

Funding

Mechanisms of Word Learning in InfancyDP5OD019812 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BERGELSON, ELIKA · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIH HHS DP5 OD019812NIH HHS DP5-OD019812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research points to gender differences in some early language skills, but is inconclusive about the mechanisms at play, providing evidence that both infants' early input and productions may differ by gender. This study examined the linguistic input and early productions of 44 American English-learning infants (93% White) in a longitudinal sample of home recordings collected at 6-17 months (in 2014-2016). Girls produced more unique words than boys (Cohen's d = .67) and this effect grew with age, but there were no significant gender differences in language input (d = .22-.24). Instead, caregivers talked more to infants who had begun to talk (d = .93-.97), regardless of gender. Therefore, prior results highlighting gender-based input differences may have been due, at least partly, to this talking-to-talkers effect.

Indexed as

LanguageLanguage DevelopmentCognitionFemaleHumansInfantLearningLinguisticsMale

Identifiers

PMID36458329
PMCPMC10478774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.