Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458294›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

Evaluating immunochromatographic test kits for diagnosis of acute human leptospirosis: A systematic review.

Benjie M Clemente, Maria Ruth Pineda-Cortel, Oliver Villaflores

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Laboratory Diagnosis of Leptospirosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  5. Leptospirosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development of a new accurate lateral flow immunoassay for diagnosis of human leptospirosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjie M ClementeDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santo Tomas, España Boulevard, Sampaloc, Manila, Metro Manila, 1008, Philippines.
Maria Ruth Pineda-CortelDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santo Tomas, España Boulevard, Sampaloc, Manila, Metro Manila, 1008, Philippines.
Oliver VillafloresThe Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, España Boulevard, Sampaloc, Manila, Metro Manila, 1008, Philippines.
University of Santo Tomas · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Leptospirosis, a common zoonotic infection in developing countries, usually progresses to severe conditions and poor outcomes when not detected early. Microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and culture are available but are not accessible in all areas and are usually confined to specialized laboratories. There are several available immunochromatographic test kits (ICT) that offer ease of use, access, and affordability, but diagnostic accuracy is not yet well established. In this paper, we aim to review published literature on the use of ICTs for the detection of leptospirosis and evaluate their diagnostic efficiency. Materials and methods: We systematically searched multiple databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar), including gray literature sources for published research articles as of April 13, 2022, on the diagnosis of acute leptospirosis using ICT. We assessed the methodological quality of each article using the revised QUADAS-2. Results: From a total of 41 articles, 30 (73.2%) were identified as potentially relevant after reviewing the title and abstract and eliminating duplicate articles; then, 22 (53.7%) articles were included after scrutinizing and applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria to the full text. Almost all test kits detect IgM antibodies against the Conclusion: Rapid diagnosis of acute leptospirosis is highly warranted; however, available test kits present a wide range of diagnostic accuracy. We found that LPS-specific ICT kit has the highest diagnostic efficiency; however, our analysis was limited by the included studies' heterogeneity in design and reporting; thus, we recommend standardization in the conduct and reporting of diagnostic accuracy of test kits as it is vital to evaluate the reliability of the test kit.

Indexed as

Acute human leptospirosisImmunochromatographic testLeptospiraLeptospirosis

Identifiers

PMID36458294
PMCPMC9706160
OpenAlexW4310249281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.