Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458232›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Deep Learning Model for the Image Fusion and Accurate Classification of Remote Sensing Images.

S Roselin Mary, Sunita Pachar, Prabhat Kumar Srivastava, Medhavi Malik, Avani Sharma, Tariq G Almutiri, Zabihullah Atal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S Roselin MaryDepartment of CSE, Anand Institute of Higher Technology, Kalasalingam Nagar, Kazhipattur, OMR, Chennai 603103, India.
Sunita PacharPresident Vasundhara Blessing Foundation, Academician GLA University, Chaumuhan, India.
Prabhat Kumar SrivastavaComputer Science and Engineering Department, IMS Engineering College, Ghaziabad, UP, India.
Medhavi MalikSchool of Computing Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Noida, India.
Avani SharmaDepartment of Information Technology, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India.
Tariq G AlmutiriDepartment of Computer Science, Community College, King Saud University, Riyadh 11437, Saudi Arabia.
Zabihullah AtalDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science, Kardan University, Afghanistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7502-5534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning is widely used for the classification of images that have various attributes. Image data are used to extract colour, texture, form, and local features. These features are combined in feature-level image fusion to create a merged remote sensing image. A trained depth belief network (DBN) processes and divides fusion images, while a Softmax classifier determines the land type. As tested, the proposed approach can categorise all types of land. Traditional methods of detecting distant sensing photographs have limitations that can be overcome by using convolutional neural networks (CNN). Traditional techniques are incapable of combining deep learning elements while doing badly in classification. After PCA decreases data dimensionality, deep learning is applied to generate effective features that employ deep learning after PCA has reduced the dimensionality of the data. Principal component analysis is commonly used because of its effectiveness in attaining linear dimension reduction. It may be used on its own or as a starting point for further study into various different dimensionality reduction approaches. Data can be altered by remapping onto a new set of orthogonal axes using a process known as projection-based principal component analysis. Following remote sensing of land resources, the pictures were classified using a support vector machine. Euroset satellite images are used to assess the suggested approach. Accuracy and kappa have both increased. It was accurate and within 95.83 % of the planned figures. The classification findings' kappa value and reasoning time were 95.87 % and 128 milliseconds, respectively. Both the model's performance and the classification effect are excellent.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPrincipal Component AnalysisProblem SolvingRemote Sensing Technology

Identifiers

PMID36458232
PMCPMC9708323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.