Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458206›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice2022

Characterizing preferred terms for geographically distant simulations: distance, remote and telesimulation.

Todd P Chang, Rachel Elkin, Tehnaz P Boyle, Akira Nishisaki, Barbara Walsh, Doreen Benary, Marc Auerbach, Cheryl Camacho, Aaron Calhoun, Stephanie N Stapleton and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Distance simulation in the health professions: a scoping review.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Todd P ChangDivision of Emergency Medicine & Transport, Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rachel ElkinDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center/Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Tehnaz P BoyleDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Akira NishisakiDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Barbara WalshDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Doreen BenaryDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Marc AuerbachDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cheryl CamachoSimulation and Outreach Education, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Aaron CalhounDivision of Critical Care, Norton Children's Hospital, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Stephanie N StapletonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Travis WhitfillDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Trish WoodStarship Child Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jabeen FayyazDivision of Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Isabel T GrossDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Anita A ThomasDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Improving Prehospital Pediatric Emergency Readiness with TelemedicineK23HL145126 · NHLBI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOYLE, TEHNAZ PARAKH · 2020 to 2024
$846k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL145126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Simulationists lack standard terms to describe new practices accommodating pandemic restrictions. A standard language around these new simulation practices allows ease of communication among simulationists in various settings. Methods: We explored consensus terminology for simulation accommodating geographic separation of participants, facilitators or equipment. We used an iterative process with participants of two simulation conferences, with small groups and survey ranking. Results: Small groups (n = 121) and survey ranking (n = 54) were used with Conclusion: This research has deepened our understanding of how simulationists interpret this terminology, including the derived themes: (1) physical distance/separation, (2) overarching nature of the term and (3) implications from existing terms. We further deepen the conceptual discussion on healthcare simulation aligned with the search of the terminologies. We propose there are nuances that prevent an early consensus recommendation. A taxonomy of descriptors specifying the conduct of

Identifiers

PMID36458206
PMCPMC9710245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.