ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Development of artificial neural network models for paediatric critical illness in South Africa.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Mortality Risk for Critically Ill Children in Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Machine learning for predicting clinical outcomes of hospitalised children: a systematic review of applications in low- and middle-income countries.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Prediction of primary Hypertension in Primary Health Care Settings in Coastal Karnataka Using Artificial Neural Network.Current hypertension reviews · 2025Article
- Use of artificial intelligence in healthcare in South Africa: A scoping review.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2025Review
- A validation of machine learning models for the identification of critically ill children presenting to the paediatric emergency room of a tertiary hospital in South Africa: A proof of concept.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2024Article
- Elicitation of domain knowledge for a machine learning model for paediatric critical illness in South Africa.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Failures in identification, resuscitation and appropriate referral have been identified as significant contributors to avoidable severity of illness and mortality in South African children. In this study, artificial neural network models were developed to predict a composite outcome of death before discharge from hospital or admission to the PICU. These models were compared to logistic regression and XGBoost models developed on the same data in cross-validation. Design: Prospective, analytical cohort study. Setting: A single centre tertiary hospital in South Africa providing acute paediatric services. Patients: Children, under the age of 13 years presenting to the Paediatric Referral Area for acute consultations. Outcomes: Predictive models for a composite outcome of death before discharge from hospital or admission to the PICU. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: 765 patients were included in the data set with 116 instances (15.2%) of the study outcome. Models were developed on three sets of features. Two derived from sequential floating feature selection (one inclusive, one parsimonious) and one from the Akaike information criterion to yield 9 models. All developed models demonstrated good discrimination on cross-validation with mean ROC AUCs greater than 0.8 and mean PRC AUCs greater than 0.53. ANN1, developed on the inclusive feature-et demonstrated the best discrimination with a ROC AUC of 0.84 and a PRC AUC of 0.64 Model calibration was variable, with most models demonstrating weak calibration. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that all models were superior to baseline strategies, with ANN1 demonstrating the highest net benefit. Conclusions: All models demonstrated satisfactory performance, with the best performing model in cross-validation being an ANN model. Given the good performance of less complex models, however, these models should also be considered, given their advantage in ease of implementation in practice. An internal validation study is now being conducted to further assess performance with a view to external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.