Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458145›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Development of artificial neural network models for paediatric critical illness in South Africa.

Michael A Pienaar, Joseph B Sempa, Nicolaas Luwes, Elizabeth C George, Stephen C Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael A PienaarPaediatric Critical Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Joseph B SempaDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Nicolaas LuwesDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Elizabeth C GeorgeMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen C BrownPaediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Failures in identification, resuscitation and appropriate referral have been identified as significant contributors to avoidable severity of illness and mortality in South African children. In this study, artificial neural network models were developed to predict a composite outcome of death before discharge from hospital or admission to the PICU. These models were compared to logistic regression and XGBoost models developed on the same data in cross-validation. Design: Prospective, analytical cohort study. Setting: A single centre tertiary hospital in South Africa providing acute paediatric services. Patients: Children, under the age of 13 years presenting to the Paediatric Referral Area for acute consultations. Outcomes: Predictive models for a composite outcome of death before discharge from hospital or admission to the PICU. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: 765 patients were included in the data set with 116 instances (15.2%) of the study outcome. Models were developed on three sets of features. Two derived from sequential floating feature selection (one inclusive, one parsimonious) and one from the Akaike information criterion to yield 9 models. All developed models demonstrated good discrimination on cross-validation with mean ROC AUCs greater than 0.8 and mean PRC AUCs greater than 0.53. ANN1, developed on the inclusive feature-et demonstrated the best discrimination with a ROC AUC of 0.84 and a PRC AUC of 0.64 Model calibration was variable, with most models demonstrating weak calibration. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that all models were superior to baseline strategies, with ANN1 demonstrating the highest net benefit. Conclusions: All models demonstrated satisfactory performance, with the best performing model in cross-validation being an ANN model. Given the good performance of less complex models, however, these models should also be considered, given their advantage in ease of implementation in practice. An internal validation study is now being conducted to further assess performance with a view to external validation.

Indexed as

childrencritical caremachine learningneural networksseverity of illnesstriage

Identifiers

PMID36458145
PMCPMC9705750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.