ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2022
Anemia in Pregnancy: A knowledge, Attitude and Practice Survey Amongst Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in India.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation challenges of India's national anaemia reduction program among pregnant women: insights from mixed-methods implementation research.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anemia continues to affect one-third of the global population and is one of the most common reasons for large-scale morbidity and mortality especially among women. The importance of iron-rich diet has always been the backbone of preventing iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in vulnerable age groups followed by oral iron therapy and parenteral iron therapy as the next options in management of iron deficiency. Objective: Objective of this survey was to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of obstetricians and gynaecologists relevant to anemia in pregnancy and identify the practice gaps in management of anemia in pregnancy. Methods: This was a knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) survey involving obstetricians and gynaecologists (ObGyns) across India. A validated questionnaire of twenty questions was used to assess knowledge, attitude and practice about anemia and its management. Results were expressed as percentages. Results: 1974 ObGyns participated in the survey. 88.7% ObGyns screen anemia in first trimester, 53.7% ObGyns perform CBC along with RBC indices. Majority of ObGyns estimate Hb thrice during antenatal period. 50% ObGyns do not consider thalassemia screening routinely and deworming regularly. 92.4% ObGyns believe that iron supplementation is required even if Hb > 11 g/dL. Majority of them prefer low-dose iron therapy, 59.9% prefer to use 100 mg oral iron daily. Almost half of ObGyns prefer to change iron salt when patients do not respond, instead of escalating to injectable iron. Interestingly 52% ObGyns evaluate serum ferritin before starting intravenous iron therapy. 43.5% perform Hb estimation as early as 2 weeks after IV iron therapy. Majority (82.2%) of ObGyns prefer blood transfusion as a treatment of choice when Hb < 5 g/dl at 34 weeks gestation. Only 40.5% of participants are aware of the exact cut-off for diagnosing postpartum anemia. Majority of the ObGyns are aware of the iron prophylaxis in postpartum period till 3-6 months. More than 90% ObGyns consider intravenous iron for severe anemia of postpartum period. Conclusion: The present KAP survey highlights the observation, perception and the practicing behaviour of obstetricians and gynaecologists on anemia in pregnancy and identifies practice gaps in anemia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.