Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458054›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Perspective: Opportunities for advancing aquatic invertebrate welfare.

Sarah J Wahltinez, Nicole I Stacy, Catherine A Hadfield, Craig A Harms, Gregory A Lewbart, Alisa L Newton, Elizabeth A Nunamaker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing Local Anesthesia in Octopus bimaculoides to Provide Analgesia.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Invasive Alien SpeciesAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Postscript to Invertebrate Welfare: "We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us".Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Considerations for implementing regulation of decapods in science.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah J WahltinezDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Nicole I StacyDepartment of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Catherine A HadfieldSeattle Aquarium, Seattle, WA, United States.
Craig A HarmsDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Center for Marine Sciences and Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Morehead City, NC, United States.
Gregory A LewbartCollege of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Alisa L NewtonZooQuatic Laboratory, LLC, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Elizabeth A NunamakerGlobal Animal Welfare and Training, Charles River Laboratory, Wilmington, MA, United States.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of Florida · USCharles River Laboratories (United States) · USSeattle Aquarium · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Welfare considerations and regulations for invertebrates have lagged behind those for vertebrates, despite invertebrates comprising more than 95% of earth's species. Humans interact with and use aquatic invertebrates for exhibition in zoos and aquaria, as pets, research subjects, and important food sources. Recent research has indicated that aquatic invertebrates, in particular cephalopod mollusks and decapod crustaceans, experience stress and may be able to feel pain. With this article, we present results of a survey on attitudes of aquatic animal health professionals toward aquatic invertebrate welfare and provide practical recommendations for advancing aquatic invertebrate welfare across four areas of opportunity: use of anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia; development of less invasive diagnostic and research sampling methods based on 3R principles; use of humane slaughter methods for aquatic invertebrates; and reducing impacts of invasive procedures in aquaculture and fisheries. We encourage consideration of these opportunities to achieve far-reaching improvements in aquatic invertebrate welfare.

Indexed as

anesthesiaanimal welfareeuthanasiahumane slaughterrefinement

Identifiers

PMID36458054
PMCPMC9705766
OpenAlexW4309212058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.