Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36458040›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

The analgesic effect of different interactive modes of virtual reality: A prospective functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

Xue Deng, Chuyao Jian, Qinglu Yang, Naifu Jiang, Zhaoyin Huang, Shaofeng Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xue DengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Chuyao JianDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Qinglu YangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Naifu JiangKey Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shenzhen, China.
Zhaoyin HuangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Shaofeng ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNEighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen UniversityShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality has demonstrated its analgesic effectiveness. However, its optimal interactive mode for pain relief is yet unclear, with rare objective measurements that were performed to explore its neural mechanism. Objective: This study primarily aimed at investigating the analgesic effect of different VR interactive modes Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers (Age: 21.93 ± 0.59 years, 11 female, 4 male) were enrolled in this prospective study. Three rounds of interactive mode, including active mode, motor imagery (MI) mode, and passive mode, were successively facilitated under consistent noxious electrical stimuli (electrical intensity: 23.67 ± 5.69 mA). Repeated-measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to examine its pain relief status and cortical activation, with Results: A larger analgesic effect on the active (-1.4(95%CI, -2.23 to -0.57), Conclusion: Our findings suggest that VR can be considered as an effective non-invasive approach for pain relief by modulating cortical pain processing. A better analgesic effect can be obtained by exciting and integrating cortical ROIs in charge of motor and cognitive functions. The interactive mode can be easily tailored to be in line with the client's characteristics, in spite of the diverse cortical activation status when an equivalent analgesic effect can be obtained.

Indexed as

analgesiafNIRSfunctional near infrared spectroscopypainvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36458040
PMCPMC9707398
OpenAlexW4309214959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.