ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
Development and Application of a New T-shaped Internal Trabeculotomy Hook (T-hook).
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative One-Year Outcomes of T-HookJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Mid-Term Surgical Outcomes of T-Hook, 360° Suture Trabeculotomy, Kahook Dual Blade, and Tanito Microhook Procedures: A Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Diabetes Mellitus: A Risk Factor in Schlemm's Canal-Based Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Historical and Contemporary Debates in Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Trends in the National Ophthalmological Healthcare Focusing on Cataract, Retina, and Glaucoma Over 15 Years in Japan.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We introduce a newly designed T-shaped internal trabeculotomy hook and compare its surgical outcomes with those of Kahook dual blade (KDB) surgery. Patients and Methods: One eye each of seventeen and sixty-one patients underwent T-hook and KDB surgeries, respectively. Post-surgical intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, visual acuity, and prevalence of IOP spikes and hyphema were compared between the two cohorts. Results: The utility of the T-hook was excellent and enabled the easy opening of the Schlemm's canal. The pre-surgical IOP of 25.6 ±7.5 mmHg in the T-hook cohort decreased to 14.1 ± 4.3 (-41.2% reduction) and 15.0 ± 3.1mmHg (-39.3% reduction) at 3 (P<0.001) and 6 months (P=0.003), respectively. Pre-surgical medications of 2.8 decreased to 2.3 and 2.0 medications, respectively, at 3 and 6 months. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from the pre-surgical logarithm of the minimum angle resolution (logMAR) of 0.148 to -0.012 at three months (P=0.036,). While the pre-surgical IOP of 24.9±4.3 mmHg in the KDB cohort decreased to 16.5±5.7 mmHg (-35.5%, P<0.001) and 16.1±3.4 mmHg (-33.5%, P<0.001) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Reduction in medications at 3- and 12-month timepoints (from 2.8 to 1.7 and 1.7, respectively; P<0.001) and improvement in BCVA at three months (from 0.106 to -0.025 logMAR, P<0.001) were also significant. There was no difference between the T-hook and KDB cohorts in terms of the pre-surgical IOP (P=0.15) and post-surgical IOP at 1 (P=0.27), 3 (P=0.17), 6 (P=0.47), and 12 months (P=0.11, Mann-Whitney Conclusion: The novel T-hook was easy to use and was as useful as the KDB device in performing internal trabeculotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.