ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Association between the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio and adverse clinical prognosis in patients with young stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incremental Prognostic Value of the C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio Beyond a Parsimonious Clinical Reference Model in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio for in-hospital mortality in acute stroke patients.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- The association between C-reactive protein to albumin ratio and 6-month neurological outcome in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Association of the High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio with Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque: A Community-Based Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Serum C-reactive protein to albumin ratio as a potential risk indicator of pneumonia caused byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a biomarker in patients with sepsis: a novel LASSO-COX based prognostic nomogram.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The inflammatory response plays an important role in ischemic stroke, and the incidence of stroke in young adults has increased rapidly in recent years. The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is a new index that reflects the overall inflammatory status of patients with major diseases; however, no studies have reported the relationship between CAR and young stroke. Methods: The participants' baseline characteristics and laboratory examination results, including CAR, were obtained at admission. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at the 30-day and 90-day follow-ups were obtained from all patients. All the participants included in the study were classified into four groups according to CAR quartiles (Q1-Q4). Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between different CAR levels and adverse outcomes (mRS 3-6 and mRS 2-6). We also plotted receiver operating characteristic curves of CAR for adverse clinical outcomes and calculated the area under the curve and cutoff values. Results: A total of 630 patients with young stroke were enrolled in the study. In the multivariate logistic regression model, at the 30-day follow-up, the Q3 and Q4 (significantly increased CAR) groups showed an elevated risk of mRS score of 2-6 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-6.16, Conclusion: A significantly increased CAR was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in young patients with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.