Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457844›Full record

ReviewSAGE open medicine2022

Worldwide magnitude of inguinal hernia: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies.

Melese Shenkut Abebe, Amare Abera Tareke, Addis Alem, Wondwossen Debebe, Altaseb Beyene

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Learning curve in robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparison ofQatar medical journal · 2026
    Article
  16. Circulating Biomarkers as Potential Risk Factors for Inguinal Hernia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Association between constipation and inguinal hernia: a case-control study in an adult population.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melese Shenkut AbebeDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3528-4384
Amare Abera TarekeDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-8168
Addis AlemDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-7562
Wondwossen DebebeDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Altaseb BeyeneDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review pooled the magnitude of inguinal hernia based on the available population-based studies conducted throughout the world. We have searched for population-based articles reporting the magnitude of inguinal hernia on PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar. Random-effect meta-analysis was carried out to pool the magnitude of inguinal hernia and its proportion between male and female subjects. To determine the presence of between-study heterogeneity, I

Indexed as

Inguinal herniamagnitudemeta-analysisprevalencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36457844
PMCPMC9706054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.