Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457830›Full record

ReviewBehavior analysis in practice2022

Erick M Dubuque, Ellie Kazemi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior analysis in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erick M DubuqueThe Council of Autism Service Providers, University of Louisville, 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3562-7554
Ellie KazemiDepartment of Psychology, California State University, CA 91330 Northridge, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of colleges and universities offering behavior analytic training has grown rapidly over the last decade and it is time for our profession to evaluate the rigor of such trainings and to gain quality control. In this study we set out to investigate first-time pass rates on the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) examinations across Verified Course Sequences (VCSs) using publicly available data between 2013 to 2020. We evaluated outcomes related to overall first-time pass rates; the small number of programs contributing the greatest number of BCBA exam candidates; and the difference in first-time pass rates by mode of instruction and ABAI accreditation. We discuss the use of first-time pass rate data as a quality indicator and provide some recommendations based on the outcomes evaluated.

Indexed as

Applied behavior analysis training programsBehavior Analyst Certification BoardExamination pass ratesQuality indicatorsVerified Course Sequence

Identifiers

PMID36457830
PMCPMC9582067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.