ArticleCureus2022
Reducing Exposure to X-Ray in Patients With Conservatively Managed Distal Radius Fractures: A Closed-Loop Pilot Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) guidelines state that a radiograph of the wrist at the time of removal of immobilisation is not required in conservatively managed distal radius fracture (DRF) patients unless there is clinical cause for concern. The aim of this pilot audit was to investigate local compliance with these guidelines. Materials and methods The first cycle of a retrospective audit was performed on conservatively managed DRF patients presenting between August and October 2021. An intervention was introduced in the form of education to highlight current guidelines. A second cycle was then performed prospectively on patients presenting between February and April 2022. Data was analysed to assess whether radiographs were taken at the time of cast removal, if the indication for the radiograph was documented and whether it affected the management plan. Results In the first cycle, 20 of 46 patients (43.5%) had repeat radiographs at the time of cast removal compared to 12 of 41 patients (29.3%) in the second cycle (p=0.170). None of the first-cycle patients had any documentation on the indication for radiograph at the time of cast removal and none of the radiographs altered the management plan. In the second cycle documentation on the indication for the radiograph was present for seven of the 12 radiographs and two altered the management plan. Conclusion Through education on adherence to national guidelines, the number of radiographs in patients with conservatively managed DRFs was reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.