ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Development of a 3D printed surgical guide for Brugada syndrome substrate ablation.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a patient-specific epicardial guide for ventricular tachycardia ablation surgery using high-consistency rubber silicone molding.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Impact of Disinfection and Sterilization on 3D-Printing Resin Performance for Surgical Guides in Cardiac Ablation Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancing Surgical Arrhythmia Ablation: Novel Insights on 3D Printing Applications and Two Biocompatible Materials.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a disease associated with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Epicardial ablation has demonstrated high therapeutic efficacy in preventing ventricular arrhythmias. The purpose of this research is to define a workflow to create a patient-specific 3D-printed tool to be used as a surgical guide for epicardial ablation in BrS. Methods: Due to their mechanical properties and biocompatibility, the MED625FLX and TPU95A were used for cardiac 3D surgical guide printing. ECG imaging was used to define the target region on the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CT scan imaging was used to design the model based on patient anatomy. A 3D patient-specific heart phantom was also printed for fitting test. Sterilization test was finally performed. Results: 3D printed surgical models with both TPU95A and MED625FLX models were in agreement with pre-specified imputed measurements. The phantom test showed retention of shape and correct fitting of the surgical tool to the reproduced phantom anatomy, as expected, for both materials. The surgical guide adapted to both the RVOT and the left anterior descending artery. Two of the 3D models produced in MED265FLX showed damage due to the sterilization process. Conclusions: A 3D printed patient-specific surgical guide for epicardial substrate ablation in BrS is feasible if a specific workflow is followed. The design of the 3D surgical guide ensures proper fitting on the heart phantom with good stability. Further investigations for clinical use are eagerly awaited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.