Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457648›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Patient-reported outcomes for the Intergroup Sentinel Mamma study (INSEMA): A randomised trial with persistent impact of axillary surgery on arm and breast symptoms in patients with early breast cancer.

Toralf Reimer, Angrit Stachs, Kristina Veselinovic, Silke Polata, Thomas Müller, Thorsten Kühn, Jörg Heil, Beyhan Ataseven, Roland Reitsamer, Guido Hildebrandt and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02466737 (Comparison of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus no Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early-stage Invasive Breast Cancer and Breast-conserving Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02466737 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Comparison of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus no Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early-stage Invasive Breast Cancer and Breast-conserving Surgery: a Randomized Prospective Surgical Trial. Intergroup-Sentinel-Mamma (INSEMA)-Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RostockRan2015 to 2029Enrolled5,505ConditionsBreast CancerArmsno axillary surgery versus SLNB, SLNB versus completion ALND
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Arm morbidity and financial difficulty in breast cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Toralf ReimerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Südring 81, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Angrit StachsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Südring 81, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Kristina VeselinovicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm, Prittwitzstr. 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Silke PolataBreast Center, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstr. 555, 13589 Berlin, Germany.
Thomas MüllerWomen's Hospital, Klinikum Hanau GmbH, Leimenstr. 20, 63450 Hanau, Germany.
Thorsten KühnWomen's Hospital, Klinikum Esslingen, Hirschlandstr. 97, 73730 Esslingen, Germany.
Jörg HeilBreast Unit, University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Beyhan AtasevenDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136 Essen, Germany.
Roland ReitsamerBreast Center, LKH Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Clinics, Müllner Hauptstr. 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Guido HildebrandtDepartment of Radiotherapy, University of Rostock, Südring 75, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Michael KnauerBrustzentrum Ost, Rohrschacher Str. 286, CH-9016 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Michael GolattaBreast Unit, Sankt Elisabeth Hospital, Max-Reger-Str. 5-7, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea StefekWomen's Hospital, Johanniter-Hospital Stendal, Wendstr. 31, 39576 Stendal, Germany.
Dirk-Michael ZahmBreast Center, SRH Waldklinikum Gera, Str. des Friedens 122, 07548 Gera, Germany.
Marc ThillDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, W.-Epstein-Str. 4, 60431 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Valentina NekljudovaGerman Breast Group, Dornhofstr. 10, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
David KrugDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str., 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, Dornhofstr. 10, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Bernd GerberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Südring 81, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
INSEMA investigators
University of Rostock · DEGerman Breast group · DEAgaplesion Markus Hospital · DEKlinikum Esslingen · DEKlinikum Hanau · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATSRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DESt. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEWaldkrankenhaus Protestant Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In clinically node-negative breast cancer patients, the INSEMA trial (NCT02466737) assessed the non-inferiority of avoiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Here we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as a secondary endpoint. Methods: PROs were assessed for patients with no axillary surgery, SLNB alone, and ALND. Quality of life (QoL) questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 and its breast cancer module (BR23) were used at baseline (pre-surgery) and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. The QoL scores were compared using repeated measures mixed models based on the safety set. Findings: Between 2015 and 2019, 5502 patients were recruited for the first randomization, and 5154 were included in the intent-to-treat set (4124 SLNB versus 1030 no SLNB). In the case of one to three macrometastases after SLNB, 485 patients underwent second randomization (242 SLNB alone versus 243 ALND). Questionnaire completion response remained high throughout the trial: over 70% at all time points for the first randomization. There were significant differences for the BRBS (breast symptoms) and BRAS (arm symptoms) scores favoring the no SLNB group in all post-baseline assessments. Patients in the SLNB group showed significantly and clinically relevant higher scores for BRAS (differences in mean values ≥5.0 points at all times), including pain, arm swelling, and impaired mobility in all postoperative visits, with the highest difference at one month after surgery. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire revealed no relevant differences between the treatment groups, although some comparisons were statistically significant. Interpretation: This is one of the first randomized trials investigating the omission of SLNB in clinically node-negative patients and the first to report comprehensive QoL data. Patients with no SLNB benefitted regarding arm symptoms/functioning, while no relevant differences in other scales were seen. Funding: Supported by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, Bonn, Germany), Grant No. 110580 and Grant No. 70110580 to University Medicine Rostock.

Indexed as

Axillary surgeryBreast cancerPatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeSentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36457648
PMCPMC9706517
OpenAlexW4310071647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.