ReviewCureus2022
Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer Management.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut microbiota signatures and machine learning-based candidate feature prioritization in advanced colorectal cancer.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Understanding the cellular and molecular heterogeneity in colorectal cancer through the use of single-cell RNA sequencing.Translational oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of surgical timing on postoperative quality of life in acute cholecystitis: a comparative analysis of early, intermediate, and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Natural compounds modulate the mechanism of action of tumour-associated macrophages against colorectal cancer: a review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Interaction between Gut Microbiota and Dendritic Cells in Colorectal Cancer.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Therapeutic Perspectives for Microbiota Transplantation in Digestive Diseases and Neoplasia-A Literature Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most typical lethal cancers. One of the main factors for better outcomes in CRC management is the early detection of the disease. As an integral component of human metabolism and homeostasis, gut microbiome has recently been a subject of extensive research for its role in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of CRC. Microbial dysbiosis (the decrease in beneficial gut flora and the increase of detrimental populations) leads to chronic inflammation and genetic alteration in the host cells, triggering and promoting CRC carcinogenesis. Identifying these microbial changes in depth would potentially isolate the pathogenic microbiota species and establish biomarker models for early detection of CRC. On the other hand, modifying these microbial changes would help formulate preventative and therapeutic strategies for CRC, developing a more precise CRC management plan according to each patient's microbial print. This essay explains gut microbiome composition, microbial changes (dysbiosis) in CRC carcinogenesis, the probability of creating microbiome-based CRC biomarkers, and potential microbiome-targeted treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.