Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457363›Full record

ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2022

Identifying Body Awareness-Related Brain Network Changes After Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation for Neuropathic Pain Relief in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ann Van de Winckel, Sydney Carpentier, Wei Deng, Sara Bottale, Timothy Hendrickson, Lin Zhang, Rob Wudlick, Clas Linnman, Ricardo Battaglino, Leslie Morse

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04706208 (Identifying Body Awareness-related Brain Network Changes During Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation for Reduced Neuropathic Pain in People With Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04706208 nacompletednot on this map

Identifying Body Awareness-related Brain Network Changes During Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation for Reduced Neuropathic Pain in People With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled58ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Neuropathic PainArmsCognitive Multisensory Therapy, Usual Care, Clinical Assessment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), OPTIONAL: blood draw
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Case Report: Phantom limb pain relief after cognitive multisensory rehabilitation.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann Van de WinckelDivision of Physical Therapy, Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sydney CarpentierDivision of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Wei DengDivision of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sara BottaleCentro Studi di Riabilitazione Neurocognitiva - Villa Miari (Study Center for Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation), Santorso, Italy.
Timothy HendricksonUniversity of Minnesota Informatics Institute, Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Lin ZhangDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rob WudlickDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Clas LinnmanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ricardo BattaglinoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Leslie MorseDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USCentro di Terapia Metacognitiva Interpersonale · ITSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Institutional Center Cores for Advanced NeuroimagingP30NS076408 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2012 to 2020
$4.2M
High Performance Connectome Upgrade for Human 3T MR ScannerS10OD017974 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LIM, KELVIN O. · 2014 to 2014
$600k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NIH HHS S10 OD017974NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS076408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: About 69% of the 299,000 Americans living with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience long-term debilitating neuropathic pain. New treatments are needed because current treatments do not provide enough pain relief. We have found that insular-opercular brain network alterations may contribute to neuropathic pain and that restoring this network could reduce neuropathic pain. Here, we outline a study protocol using a physical therapy approach, cognitive multisensory rehabilitation (CMR), which has been shown to restore OP1/OP4 connections in adults post stroke, to test our hypothesis that CMR can normalize pain perception through restoring OP1/OP4 connectivity in adults with SCI and relieve neuropathic pain. Objectives: To compare baseline brain function via resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging in adults with SCI versus uninjured controls, and to identify changes in brain function and behavioral pain outcomes after CMR in adults with SCI. Methods: In this phase I randomized controlled trial, adults with SCI will be randomized into two groups: Group A will receive 6 weeks of CMR followed by 6 weeks of standard of care (no therapy) at home. Group B will start with 6 weeks of standard of care (no therapy) at home and then receive 6 weeks of CMR. Neuroimaging and behavioral measures are collected at baseline, after the first 6 weeks (A: post therapy, B: post waitlist), and after the second 6 weeks (A: post-therapy follow-up, B: post therapy), with follow-up of both groups up to 12 months. Conclusion: The successful outcome of our study will be a critical next step toward implementing CMR in clinical care to improve health in adults with SCI.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultBrainClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicCognitionHumansPain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicfunctional magnetic resonance imagingmovementmultisensory rehabilitationneuropathic painproprioceptionsensationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID36457363
PMCPMC9678218
OpenAlexW4310702742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.