Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457354›Full record

ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2022

Effectiveness of Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation for Improving Bowel Function in People With a Spinal Cord Injury: A Study Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Gabrielle M Allen, Anne E Palermo, Keith M D McNaughton, Claire L Boswell-Ruys, Bonsan B Lee, Jane E Butler, Simon C Gandevia, Euan J McCaughey

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabrielle M AllenNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Anne E PalermoNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Keith M D McNaughtonNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Claire L Boswell-RuysNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Bonsan B LeeNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Jane E ButlerNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Simon C GandeviaNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Euan J McCaugheyNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with a spinal cord injury (SCI) have a high rate of bowel-related morbidity, even compared with people with other neurological disorders. These complications lower quality of life and place a financial burden on the health system. A noninvasive intervention that improves the bowel function of people with an SCI should reduce morbidity, improve quality of life, and lead to cost savings for health care providers. Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of noninvasive abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) for improving bowel function in people with a chronic SCI. Methods: A prospective, double-blinded, 1:1 randomized, placebo-controlled intervention trial will be conducted with 80 adults with chronic SCI (>12 months since injury) above T8 single neurological level. The intervention will be a 45-minute abdominal FES (or placebo) session, 3 days per week, for 6 weeks. Main Study Parameters/Endpoints: Primary endpoint is whole gut transit time before and after 6 weeks of abdominal FES. Secondary endpoints measured before and after 6 weeks of abdominal FES are (1) colonic transit time; (2) quality of life (EQ-5D-5L); (3) participant-reported bowel function (International SCI Bowel Function Basic Data Set Questionnaire and visual analogue scale); (4) respiratory function (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, maximal inspiratory pressure, and maximal expiratory pressure); (5) bladder symptoms (Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score); (6) daily bowel management diary; and (7) unplanned hospital visits. Conclusion: Safety data will be collected, and a cost utility analysis using quality of life scores will be performed. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12621000386831.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesAdultAustraliaElectric StimulationHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicabdominal functional electrical stimulationbowel functionrespiratory functionspinal cord injurywhole gut transit time

Identifiers

PMID36457354
PMCPMC9678222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.