Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457205›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

Narrative Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Qian-Ru Shen, Meng-Ting Hu, Wei Feng, Kun-Peng Li, Wu Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Effects of home-based neurostimulation on outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  9. Comparative efficacy of different noninvasive brain stimulation protocols on upper-extremity motor function and activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. An integrated investigation of systemic and localized pathophysiological mechanisms of stroke and multimodal therapeutic strategies.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advanced rehabilitation in ischaemic stroke research.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. New approaches to recovery after stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Somatosensory Impairment and Chronic Pain Following Stroke: An Observational Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian-Ru ShenSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Meng-Ting HuSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Wei FengSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Kun-Peng LiSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Wu WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Therapy, The Second Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China (mainland).ORCID 0000-0001-6049-1524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a disease with a high incidence and disability rate, resulting in changes in neural network and corticoid-subcortical excitability and various functional disabilities. The aim of the present study was to discuss the current status of research and limitations and potential direction in the application of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on post-stroke patients. This literature review focused on clinical studies and reviews. Literature retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and CNKI, using the following keywords: Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Transcranial alternating current stimulation, Transcranial alternating current stimulation, Transcranial focused ultrasound, Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation, Stroke, and Rehabilitation. We selected 200 relevant publications from 1985 to 2022. An overview of recent research on the use of NIBS on post-stroke patients, including its mechanism, therapeutic parameters, effects, and safety, is presented. It was found that NIBS has positive therapeutic effects on dysfunctions of motor, sensory, cognitive, speech, swallowing, and depression after stroke, but standardized stimulus programs are still lacking. The literature suggests that rTMS and tDCS are more beneficial to post-stroke patients, while tFUS and tVNS are currently less studied for post-stroke rehabilitation, but are also potential interventions.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationBrainHumansTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36457205
PMCPMC9724451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.