ArticleBMC oral health2022
In vitro antibacterial effects of photodynamic therapy against Enterococcus faecalis in root canals of deciduous teeth.
Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for bacterial reduction in endodontics of primary teeth: an in vitro study.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Isolation and Characterization ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in endodontics of primary teeth: a scoping review.Lasers in medical science · 2024Article
- Photodynamic Suppression of Enterococcus Faecalis in Infected Root Canals with Indocyanine Green, TroloxPharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed at evaluating the in vitro antibacterial efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on planktonic E. faecalis and its biofilm in the root canal of infected deciduous teeth.
methodsForty root canals of maxillary deciduous anterior teeth were enlarged up to #35 K-file and inoculated with E. faecalis for 21 days. The root canals were randomly assigned into four groups (n = 10): The normal saline group (control), 1% NaClO group, PDT group, and the 1% NaClO + PDT group. Paper point samples were obtained at baseline (S1) and after treatment (S2). The colony-forming units (CFU) were counted, and the bacterial growth rate calculated. From each subgroup, 5 samples were randomly selected after treatment and a scanning laser confocal microscope (CLSM) used to determine the distribution of dead / living bacteria on the biofilm surface of each subgroup. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe bacterial morphologies in the root canal walls of the remaining 5 samples in each subgroup. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn test with boferroni adjustment were used to analyze the effect of the different treatment techniques on the E. faecalis in root canals.
resultsCompared to the saline group, PDT significantly reduced bacterial counts in the root canal (p < 0.05). The CFU counts were lowest (p < 0.05) in the 1% NaClO and in 1% NaClO + PDT groups. The rate of bacterial death on the surface of the biofilm in the PDT group was significantly increased after treatment (p < 0.05), and the rate of bacterial death was highest in 1%NaClO group and 1%NaClO + PDT group (p < 0.05).
conclusionPDT has an antibacterial activity against E. faecalis in the root canal of deciduous teeth. Its activity against planktonic E. faecalis is better than the activity on the intact biofilm. The antibacterial activity of PDT on E. faecalis in root canals of deciduous teeth is lower compared to that of 1% NaClO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.