Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457120›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

Connecting for Care: a protocol for a mixed-method social network analysis to advance knowledge translation in the field of child development and rehabilitation.

Stephanie Glegg, Carrie Costello, Symbia Barnaby, Christine Cassidy, Kathryn M Sibley, Kelly Russell, Shauna Kingsnorth, Lesley Pritchard, Olaf Kraus de Camargo, John Andersen and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Stephanie GleggDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, T325 - 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5, Canada. Stephanie.glegg@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-6983
Carrie CostelloChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Excellence in Neurodevelopment and Rehabilitation Research in Child Health (ENRRICH) Theme, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Symbia BarnabyMoms Against Racism, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Christine CassidySchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kathryn M SibleyCommunity Health Sciences and George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kelly RussellChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Excellence in Neurodevelopment and Rehabilitation Research in Child Health (ENRRICH) Theme, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Shauna KingsnorthEvidence to Care, Teaching & Learning Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lesley PritchardDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Olaf Kraus de CamargoCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
John AndersenDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Samantha BellefeuilleChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea CrossCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Janet CurranSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kim HeskethChildren's Treatment Network, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada.
Jeremy LaycoChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Excellence in Neurodevelopment and Rehabilitation Research in Child Health (ENRRICH) Theme, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
James ReynoldsFaculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Paula RobesonChildren's Healthcare Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon StrausDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kristy WittmeierChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Excellence in Neurodevelopment and Rehabilitation Research in Child Health (ENRRICH) Theme, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 175374CIHR 178291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConnections between individuals and organizations can impact knowledge translation (KT). This finding has led to growing interest in the study of social networks as drivers of KT. Social networks are formed by the patterns of relationships or connections generated through interactions. These connections can be studied using social network analysis (SNA) methodologies. The relatively small yet diverse community in the field of child development and rehabilitation (CD&R) in Canada offers an ideal case study for applying SNA. The purposes of this work are to (1) quantify and map the structure of Canadian CD&R KT networks among four groups: families, health care providers, KT support personnel, and researchers; (2) explore participant perspectives of the network structure and of KT barriers and facilitators within it; and (3) generate recommendations to improve KT capacity within and between groups. Aligning with the principles of integrated KT, we have assembled a national team whose members contribute throughout the research and KT process, with representation from the four participant groups.

methodsA sequential, explanatory mixed-method study, within the bounds of a national case study in the field of CD&R. Objective 1: A national SNA survey of family members with advocacy/partnership experience, health care providers, KT support personnel, and researchers, paired with an anonymous survey for family member without partnership experience, will gather data to describe the KT networks within and between groups and identify barriers and facilitators of network connections. Objective 2: Purposive sampling from Phase 1 will identify semi-structured interview participants with whom to examine conventional and network-driven KT barriers, facilitators, and mitigating strategies. Objective 3: Intervention mapping and a Delphi process will generate recommendations for network and conventional interventions to strengthen the network and facilitate KT. DISCUSSION: This study will integrate network and KT theory in mapping the structure of the CD&R KT network, enhance our understanding of conventional and network-focused KT barriers and facilitators, and provide recommendations to strengthen KT networks. Recommendations can be applied and tested within the field of CD&R to improve KT, with the aim of ensuring children achieve the best health outcomes possible through timely access to effective healthcare.

Indexed as

Child developmentHealthcareKnowledge translationMixed methodsProtocolRehabilitationSocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID36457120
PMCPMC9713183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.