Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457108›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

An improved workflow for accurate and robust healthcare environmental surveillance using metagenomics.

Jiaxian Shen, Alexander G McFarland, Ryan A Blaustein, Laura J Rose, K Allison Perry-Dow, Anahid A Moghadam, Mary K Hayden, Vincent B Young, Erica M Hartmann

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Emerging technologies and current challenges in intratumoral microbiota research.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  18. The indoors microbiome and human health.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaxian ShenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208-3109, USA. jiaxianshen2022@u.northwestern.edu.
Alexander G McFarlandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208-3109, USA.
Ryan A BlausteinDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Laura J RoseCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
K Allison Perry-DowCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Anahid A MoghadamDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208-3109, USA.
Mary K HaydenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, USA.
Vincent B YoungDepartment of Internal Medicine/Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA.
Erica M HartmannDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208-3109, USA.
Northwestern University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

CDC HHS BAA FY2018-OADS-01 Contract 02915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective surveillance of microbial communities in the healthcare environment is increasingly important in infection prevention. Metagenomics-based techniques are promising due to their untargeted nature but are currently challenged by several limitations: (1) they are not powerful enough to extract valid signals out of the background noise for low-biomass samples, (2) they do not distinguish between viable and nonviable organisms, and (3) they do not reveal the microbial load quantitatively. An additional practical challenge towards a robust pipeline is the inability to efficiently allocate sequencing resources a priori. Assessment of sequencing depth is generally practiced post hoc, if at all, for most microbiome studies, regardless of the sample type. This practice is inefficient at best, and at worst, poor sequencing depth jeopardizes the interpretation of study results. To address these challenges, we present a workflow for metagenomics-based environmental surveillance that is appropriate for low-biomass samples, distinguishes viability, is quantitative, and estimates sequencing resources.

resultsThe workflow was developed using a representative microbiome sample, which was created by aggregating 120 surface swabs collected from a medical intensive care unit. Upon evaluating and optimizing techniques as well as developing new modules, we recommend best practices and introduce a well-structured workflow. We recommend adopting liquid-liquid extraction to improve DNA yield and only incorporating whole-cell filtration when the nonbacterial proportion is large. We suggest including propidium monoazide treatment coupled with internal standards and absolute abundance profiling for viability assessment and involving cultivation when demanding comprehensive profiling. We further recommend integrating internal standards for quantification and additionally qPCR when we expect poor taxonomic classification. We also introduce a machine learning-based model to predict required sequencing effort from accessible sample features. The model helps make full use of sequencing resources and achieve desired outcomes. Video Abstract

conclusionsThis workflow will contribute to more accurate and robust environmental surveillance and infection prevention. Lessons gained from this study will also benefit the continuing development of methods in relevant fields.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsMicrobiotaDelivery of Health CareEnvironmental MonitoringWorkflowEnvironmental surveillanceInfection preventionLow biomassMachine learningMetagenomicsQuantificationSequencing depth predictionViability

Identifiers

PMID36457108
PMCPMC9716758
OpenAlexW4310706834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.