Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36457095›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Mechanical effects of sagittal variations on Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures treated with Femoral Neck System(FNS).

Chong Nan, Liang Ma, Yuechuang Liang, Yanjun Li, Zhanbei Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chong Nan *Department of Orthopedic, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Liang Ma *Department of Orthopedic, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Yuechuang LiangDepartment of Orthopedic, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Yanjun LiDepartment of Orthopedic, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
Zhanbei MaDepartment of Orthopedic, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China. nanch.md@foxmail.com.
Baoding No.1 Central HospitalBaoding People's Hospital · CNBaoding University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe spatial position of internal fixation play a role in determining the stability of internal fixations, both in clinical practice and research. Researchers have examined the stability of FNS (Femoral neck system) in the presence of coronal plane changes. In our knowledge, due to the biomechanical limitations of the specimens, there are no mechanical studies on the sagittal variation of FNS. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical behavior of sagittal variations on Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures treated with FNS through finite element analysis.

methodsFinite element models including Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture and FNS were reconstructed. Five fracture models(superior, central, inferior, anterior, posterior) were created in accordance with the bolt location in the sagittal plane within the femoral head. Equivalent stress, shear stress, and total deformation of each model under the same physiological load were recorded.

resultsAccording to the results, the central model exhibited the slightest stress and displacement, with the exception of the superior model. The internal fixation stress of the superior model was smaller than that of the central model. However, the maximum interfragmentary stress, total deformation and shear resistance area of the superior model was larger than that of the central model.

conclusionsCentral position of FNS in the sagittal plane allowed axial compression while reducing shear stress of internal fixation and interfragmentary equivalent stress. Off-axis fixation of the femoral neck increased the strain area and total displacement of the bone, raising the risk of fixation failure. Therefore, the central placement of FNS may be a better surgical target in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Indexed as

Femoral Neck FracturesFemur NeckFemur HeadFinite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalHumansBiomechanicsFemoral neck fracturesFemoral neck systemFinite element analysis

Identifiers

PMID36457095
PMCPMC9714141
OpenAlexW4310493971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.