ArticleMicrobiome2022
Nanopore long-read-only metagenomics enables complete and high-quality genome reconstruction from mock and complex metagenomes.
Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanopore metagenomic sequencing links clinically relevant resistance determinants to pathogens.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Application of antibiotics for the selective isolation of previously uncultured species from activated sludge.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Shifts in Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Composition and Predicted Functional Potential Associated with Impatiens parviflora Invasion in Temperate Forest.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- A review of computational approaches for metagenomics by long-read sequencing.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Benchmarking short- and long-read sequencing technologies for metagenomic profiling of microbiomes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microbial diversity of plant pathogens and insect endosymbionts in Reptalus artemisiae.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- 2Pipe starts with a question: matching you with the correct pipeline for MAG reconstruction.mSystems · 2026Review
- Temporal dynamics of microbiome communities within urban compost piles undergoing the heat process.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota and resistome profiles of Swiss expatriates in Africa revealed by Nanopore metagenomics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unlocking the full potential of nanopore sequencing: tips, tricks, and advanced data analysis techniques.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- MADRe: Strain-level metagenomic classification through assembly-driven database reduction.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Distinct bacterial community structures with abundant carbon degradation and sulfur metabolisms found in different sea-ice types from the Central Arctic Ocean.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- The Role of Nucleotide Sequencing in Natural Product Drug Discovery.Journal of natural products · 2025Review
- Long read metagenomics-based precise tracking of bacterial strains and genomic changes after fecal microbiota transplantation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ecological connectivity of genomic markers of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli in Hong Kong.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The microbiologist's guide to metaproteomics.iMeta · 2025Review
- LincRNA-ASAO promotes dental pulp repair through interacting with PTBP1 to increase ALPL alternative splicing.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Commensal-derived tryptophan metabolites fortify the skin barrier: Insights from a 50-species gnotobiotic model of human skin microbiome.Cell chemical biology · 2025Article
- Microbial functional diversity and redundancy: moving forward.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate and comprehensive analyses of genome-resolved metagenomics largely depend on the reconstruction of reference-quality (complete and high-quality) genomes from diverse microbiomes. Closing gaps in draft genomes have been approaching with the inclusion of Nanopore long reads; however, genome quality improvement requires extensive and time-consuming high-accuracy short-read polishing.
resultsHere, we introduce NanoPhase, an open-source tool to reconstruct reference-quality genomes from complex metagenomes using only Nanopore long reads. Using Kit 9 and Q20+ chemistries, we first evaluated the feasibility of NanoPhase using a ZymoBIOMICS gut microbiome standard (including 21 strains), then sequenced the complex activated sludge microbiome and reconstructed 275 MAGs with median completeness of ~ 90%. As a result, NanoPhase improved the MAG contiguity (median MAG N50: 735 Kb, 44-86X compared to conventional short-read-based methods) while maintaining high accuracy, allowing for a full and accurate investigation of target microbiomes. Additionally, leveraging these high-contiguity reference-quality genomes, we identified 165 prophages within 111 MAGs, with 5 as active prophages, indicating the prophage was a neglected source of genetic diversity within microbial populations and influencer in shaping microbial composition in the activated sludge microbiome.
conclusionsOur results demonstrated that NanoPhase enables reference-quality genome reconstruction from complex metagenomes directly using only Nanopore long reads. Furthermore, besides the 16S rRNA genes and biosynthetic gene clusters, the generated high-accuracy and high-contiguity MAGs improved the host identification of critical mobile genetic elements, e.g., prophage, serving as a genomic blueprint to investigate the microbial potential and ecology in the activated sludge ecosystem. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.