ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and feasibility of a theory-guided and evidence-based physical activity intervention in pregnant women with high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot clinical trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Trial
- Early prediction of late-pregnancy hypertriglyceridemia in women with gestational diabetes: development and internal validation of a clinical risk model.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Development and multicenter validation of a novel model for selective screening of gestational diabetes mellitus: the Vietnam gestational diabetes mellitus study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Prevalence of gestational diabetes using IADPSG criteria in North India: A cross-sectional study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using early-pregnancy data: a secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study in Iran.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Application of machine learning algorithm incorporating dietary intake in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus.Endocrine connections · 2024Article
- GCKR and ADIPOQ gene polymorphisms in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.Acta diabetologica · 2023Article
- Development of machine learning models to predict gestational diabetes risk in the first half of pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Integration of clinical demographics and routine laboratory analysis parameters for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the Chinese population.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnostic Utility of Clinical and Biochemical Markers.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can lead to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, and early prevention is particularly important for their health, but there is no widely accepted approach to predict it in the early pregnancy. The aim of the present study is to build and evaluate predictive models for GDM using routine indexes, including maternal clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers, before 16 gestational weeks.
methodsA total of 2895 pregnant women were recruited and maternal clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers before 16 weeks of gestation were collected from two hospitals. All participants were randomly stratified into the training cohort and the internal validation cohort by the ratio of 7:3. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, two nomogram models, including a basic model and an extended model, were built. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical validity were used to evaluate the models in the internal validation cohort.
resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the basic and the extended model was 0.736 and 0.756 in the training cohort, and was 0.736 and 0.763 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve analysis showed that the predicted values of the two models were not significantly different from the actual observations (p = 0.289 and 0.636 in the training cohort, p = 0.684 and 0.635 in the internal validation cohort, respectively). The decision-curve analysis showed a good clinical application value of the models.
conclusionsThe present study built simple and effective models, indicating that routine clinical and laboratory parameters can be used to predict the risk of GDM in the early pregnancy, and providing a novel reference for studying the prediction of GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.