Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456970›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks.

Yiling Wei, Andong He, Chaoping Tang, Haixia Liu, Ling Li, Xiaofeng Yang, Xiufang Wang, Fei Shen, Jia Liu, Jing Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yiling Wei *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Andong He *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Chaoping TangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China.
Haixia LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Ling LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, China.
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Xiufang WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Fei ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, China.
Jia LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, China.
Ruiman LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. hqyylrm@126.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can lead to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, and early prevention is particularly important for their health, but there is no widely accepted approach to predict it in the early pregnancy. The aim of the present study is to build and evaluate predictive models for GDM using routine indexes, including maternal clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers, before 16 gestational weeks.

methodsA total of 2895 pregnant women were recruited and maternal clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers before 16 weeks of gestation were collected from two hospitals. All participants were randomly stratified into the training cohort and the internal validation cohort by the ratio of 7:3. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, two nomogram models, including a basic model and an extended model, were built. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical validity were used to evaluate the models in the internal validation cohort.

resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the basic and the extended model was 0.736 and 0.756 in the training cohort, and was 0.736 and 0.763 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve analysis showed that the predicted values of the two models were not significantly different from the actual observations (p = 0.289 and 0.636 in the training cohort, p = 0.684 and 0.635 in the internal validation cohort, respectively). The decision-curve analysis showed a good clinical application value of the models.

conclusionsThe present study built simple and effective models, indicating that routine clinical and laboratory parameters can be used to predict the risk of GDM in the early pregnancy, and providing a novel reference for studying the prediction of GDM.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalBiomarkersFamilyFemaleFetusHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareBiomarkersEarly pregnancyGestational diabetes mellitusNomogramPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID36456970
PMCPMC9714187
OpenAlexW4310494074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.