Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456942›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2022

Impact of different axial wall designs on the fracture strength and stress distribution of ceramic restorations in mandibular first molar.

Bin Luo, Xiaolu Sun, Lin He, Lidan Zhao, Xinggang Liu, Qingsong Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bin Luo *Department of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 100050, Beijing, China.
Xiaolu Sun *Shunyi Hospital, Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, 100010, Beijing, China.
Lin HeDepartment of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 100050, Beijing, China.
Lidan ZhaoDepartment of Prosthodontics, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 510013, Guangzhou, China.
Xinggang LiuDepartment of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 100050, Beijing, China. xinggang_liu@ccmu.edu.cn.
Qingsong JiangDepartment of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 100050, Beijing, China. qsjiang@ccmu.edu.cn.
Capital Medical University · CNShunyi Hospital of Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital · CNStomatology Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding ZYLX201828Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program PX2017031Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Z171100000417034Capital health research and development of special 2022-1-2141Young Scientist Program of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University YSP202207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the fracture strength and stress distribution of four ceramic restorations.

methodsForty human mandibular first molars were collected and randomized into four groups after establishing the distal defect: full crown group with 4 mm axial wall height (AWH) (FC4); short AWH crown group with 2 mm AWH (SC2); occlusal veneer group with 0 mm AWH (OV0); occlusal distal veneer group with only the distal surface prepared, and 4 mm AWH (OD4). The teeth were prepared according to the groups and the ceramic restorations were completed using celtra duo ceramic blocks. The ceramic thickness of the occlusal surface is about 1.5 mm and the edge is about 1 mm. The failure load values and fracture modes of each group were detected by mechanical test in vitro. According to the groups to establish three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) models, a 600 N loading force was applied vertically using a hemispherical indenter with a diameter of 6 mm. and compare the stress distribution under the condition of different restorations.

resultsIn vitro mechanical tests showed that the failure load values were SC2 (3232.80 ± 708.12 N) > OD4 (2886.90 ± 338.72 N) > VO0 (2133.20 ± 376.15 N) > FC4(1635.40 ± 413.05 N). The failure load values of the short AWH crown and occlusal distal veneer were significantly higher than that of occlusal veneer and full crown (P<0.05). The fracture modes of the full crown and occlusal veneer groups were mainly ceramic fractures and some were restorable tooth fractures. The short AWH crown and occlusal distal veneer groups presented with three fracture modes, the proportion of non-restorable tooth fracture was higher. The results of FEA show that under the spherical loading condition, the stress of ceramic was concentrated in the contact area of the loading head, the maximum von Mises stress values were FC4 (356.2 MPa) > VO0 (214.3 MPa) > OD4 (197.9 MPa) > SC2 (163.1 MPa). The stress of enamel was concentrated in the area where the remaining enamel was thinner, the maximum von Mises stress values was OD4 (246.2 MPa) ≈ FC4 (212.4 MPa) > VO0 (61.8 MPa) ≈ SC2 (45.81 MPa). The stress of dentin is concentrated in the root furcation and the upper third region of the root. However, stress concentration was observed at the tooth cervix in the full crown.

conclusionUnder certain conditions, the occlusal distal veneer shows better performance than the full crown.

Indexed as

Flexural StrengthTooth FracturesCeramicsDental EnamelFemaleHumansMolarAxial wall designsCeramic restorationsFracture strengthOcclusal distal veneerStress distribution

Identifiers

PMID36456942
PMCPMC9714140
OpenAlexW4311081323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.