ArticleBMC geriatrics2022
Lower body muscle strength, dynapenic obesity and risk of type 2 diabetes -longitudinal results on the chair-stand test from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07649967 (Validity and Reliability of the Mixed Reality Adaptation of the 6-Minute Walk, Timed Up and Go, and Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Tests in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validity and Reliability of the Mixed Reality Adaptation of the 6-Minute Walk, Timed Up and Go, and Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Tests in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical importance of simple muscular fitness tests to predict long-term health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 94 cohort studies.British journal of sports medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Can Difficulty Standing from a Chair Signal Early Risk of Chronic Illness? Insights from a Multi-Wave European Cohort.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Onset of Type 2 diabetes in adults aged 50 and older in Europe: an intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2024Article
- Association between muscle strength and cardiometabolic multimorbidity risk among middle-aged and older Chinese adults: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Performance of different machine learning algorithms in identifying undiagnosed diabetes based on nonlaboratory parameters and the influence of muscle strength: A cross-sectional study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Article
- Dynapenia, Muscle Quality, and Hepatic Steatosis in Patients with Obesity and Sarcopenic Obesity.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Dynapenic Abdominal Obesity and Risk of Heart Disease among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe chair-stand test is a measure of lower body muscle strength. In a longitudinal study with older adults, we investigated whether results of the five-repetition chair-stand test (CST-5) are associated with incident type 2 diabetes, and whether diabetes risk in obese persons is modified by dynapenia (age-related loss of muscle strength) in the lower limbs.
methodsWe used data of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), a panel study with eight waves carried out between 2004 and 2020 in 28 European countries and Israel mainly in persons aged 50 years or older. Forty-six thousand one hundred nineteen persons (mean age 63.5 years, 44.1% men) with CST-5 data and follow-up data for diabetes were included from wave 2 and waves 4 to 7. The mean follow-up time was 5.3 years (standard deviation 2.9 years). Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from log-linear models with a Poisson working likelihood and robust standard errors.
resultsIn the crude model, increased risks of diabetes were found for persons who considered the CST-5 as not safe, or whose times for the test were in the highest or second highest quartiles (relative risks 2.18 (95% CI: 1.95-2.43), 1.71 (1.54-1.91), 1.44 (95% CI: 1.29-1.61), reference: lowest quartile). These associations were attenuated in the fully adjusted regression model (relative risks 1.32 (95% CI: 1.17-1.48), 1.23 (1.10-1.37), 1.19 (1.06-1.33)). Furthermore, in fully adjusted models, the risk of diabetes in obese persons did not depend on whether they had low muscle strength or not. In obese persons with times for 5 sits and stands > 15 seconds, the adjusted risk of diabetes was 2.56 (95% CI: 2.22-2.95) times higher than in non-obese persons with times ≤15 seconds. The corresponding relative risk in obese persons with times ≤15 seconds was 2.45 (2.25-2.67).
conclusionsPoor results in the CST-5 were associated with an increased risk of diabetes. Among obese persons, the risk of diabetes was not modified by results of the CST-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.