Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456904›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Anxiety and loneliness among older people living in residential care facilities or receiving home care services in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional study.

Rose-Marie Johansson-Pajala, Moudud Alam, Annelie Gusdal, Petra von Heideken Wågert, Annica Löwenmark, Anne-Marie Boström, Lena Marmstål Hammar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rose-Marie Johansson-PajalaSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, P.O 325, SE-63105, Eskilstuna/Västerås, Sweden. rose-marie.johansson-pajala@mdu.se.
Moudud AlamSchool of Information and Engineering/Statistics, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Annelie GusdalSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, P.O 325, SE-63105, Eskilstuna/Västerås, Sweden.
Petra von Heideken WågertSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, P.O 325, SE-63105, Eskilstuna/Västerås, Sweden.
Annica LöwenmarkSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, P.O 325, SE-63105, Eskilstuna/Västerås, Sweden.
Anne-Marie BoströmDivision of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lena Marmstål HammarSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, P.O 325, SE-63105, Eskilstuna/Västerås, Sweden.
Mälardalen University · SEDalarna University · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people were subjected to significant restrictions on physical contacts with others during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social distancing impacts older people's experiences of anxiety and loneliness. Despite a large body of research on the pandemic, there is little research on its effects on older people in residential care facilities (RCF) and in home care services (HCS), who are the frailest of the older population. We aimed to investigate the effect of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March-May 2020 on experiences of anxiety and loneliness among older people living in RCF or receiving HCS and the impact of the progression of the pandemic on these experiences.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional design using data from the national user satisfaction survey (March - May 2020) by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Survey responses were retrieved from 27,872 older people in RCF (mean age 87 years) and 82,834 older people receiving HCS (mean age 84 years). Proportional-odds (cumulative logit) model was used to estimate the degree of association between dependent and independent variables.

resultsLoneliness and anxiety were more prevalent among the older persons living in RCF (loneliness: 69%, anxiety: 63%) than those receiving HCS (53% and 47%, respectively). Proportional odds models revealed that among the RCF and HCS respondents, the cumulative odds ratio of experiencing higher degree of anxiety increased by 1.06% and 1.04%, respectively, and loneliness by 1.13% and 1.16%, respectively, for 1% increase in the COVID-19 infection rate. Poor self-rated health was the most influential factor for anxiety in both RCF and HCS. Living alone (with HCS) was the most influential factor affecting loneliness. Experiences of disrespect from staff were more strongly associated with anxiety and loneliness in RCF than in HCS.

conclusionOlder people in RCF or receiving HCS experienced increasing levels of anxiety and loneliness as the first wave of the pandemic progressed. Older people' mental and social wellbeing should be recognized to a greater extent, such as by providing opportunities for social activities. Better preparedness for future similar events is needed, where restrictions on social interaction are balanced against the public health directives.

Indexed as

COVID-19Home Care ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLonelinessPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSwedenAgedCommunity health servicesCOVID-19EmotionsResidential facilitiesSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID36456904
PMCPMC9714409
OpenAlexW4311067645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.