Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456830›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The efficacy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on the management of gastroesophageal varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Takayuki Kondo, Kisako Fujiwara, Miyuki Nakagawa, Hidemi Unozawa, Terunao Iwanaga, Takafumi Sakuma, Naoto Fujita, Keisuke Koroki, Hiroaki Kanzaki, Kazufumi Kobayashi and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takayuki Kondo *Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan. takakondonaika@yahoo.co.jp.
Kisako Fujiwara *Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Miyuki NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Hidemi UnozawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Terunao IwanagaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Takafumi SakumaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Naoto FujitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Keisuke KorokiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Hiroaki KanzakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Kazufumi KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Soichiro KiyonoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Masato NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Naoya KanogawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Tomoko SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Sadahisa OgasawaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Eiichiro SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Yoshihiko OokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Shingo NakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Tetsuhiro ChibaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Makoto AraiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Jun KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Naoya KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Chiba University · JPChiba University Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The screening of gastroesophageal varices (GEV) is critical in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is often performed in patients with HCC. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the use of CECT in screening for GEV and predicting GEV bleeding. This retrospective study enrolled 312 consecutive patients who are initially diagnosed with HCC, measured the lower esophageal (EIV) and fundal intramural vessel (FIV) diameter on CECT, examined the changes after 1, 2, and 3 years, and verified the relationship with GEV bleeding. The EIV and FIV diameter on CECT correlates well with endoscopic variceal classification. EIV significantly worsened after 2 and 3 years. FIV showed worsening at both 1, 2, and 3 years. Cumulative GEV bleeding rates were 3.7% at 1 year and 6.2% at 3 years. The multivariate analysis revealed that EIV, FIV, and portal vein tumor thrombus were associated with GEV bleeding. Furthermore, EIV deterioration at 1, 2, and 3 years correlated with GEV bleeding. In conclusion, CECT is useful in variceal management during the longitudinal clinical course of HCC, and has the potential to decrease screening endoscopy. With deterioration in EIV, treatments should be considered due to a high-risk GEV bleeding.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularEsophageal and Gastric VaricesLiver NeoplasmsVaricose VeinsHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36456830
PMCPMC9715668
OpenAlexW4310702959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.