ArticleThe AAPS journal2022
Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics in Cynomolgus Monkeys Following Subcutaneous Administration: Physiologically Based Model Predictions from Physiochemical Properties.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translational two-pore PBPK model to characterize whole-body disposition of different-size endogenous and exogenous proteins.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Article
- Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Characterize the Effect of Molecular Charge on Whole-Body Disposition of Monoclonal Antibodies.The AAPS journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An integrated physiologically based modeling framework is presented for predicting pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of subcutaneously administered monoclonal antibodies in cynomolgus monkeys, based on in silico structure-derived metrics characterizing antibody size, overall charge, local charge, and hydrophobicity. The model accounts for antibody-specific differences in pinocytosis, transcapillary transport, local lymphatic uptake, and pre-systemic degradation at the subcutaneous injection site and reliably predicts the pharmacokinetics of five different wild-type mAbs and their Fc variants following intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Significant associations were found between subcutaneous injection site degradation rate and the antibody's local positive charge of its complementarity-determining region (R = 0.56, p = 0.0012), antibody pinocytosis rate and its overall positive charge (R = 0.59, p = 0.00063), and antibody paracellular transport and its overall charge together with hydrophobicity (R = 0.63, p = 0.00096). Based on these results, population simulations were performed to predict the relationship between bioavailability and antibody local positive charge. In addition, model simulations were conducted to calculate the relative contribution of absorption pathways (lymphatic and blood), pre-systemic degradation pathways (interstitial and lysosomal), and the influence of injection site lymph flow on antibody bioavailability and pharmacokinetics. The proposed physiologically based modeling framework integrates fundamental mechanisms governing antibody subcutaneous absorption and disposition, with structured-based physiochemical properties, to predict antibody bioavailability and pharmacokinetics in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.