Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456753›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2023

Efficacy of a new traction method using ring-shaped thread for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the pharynx.

Kenshi Matsuno, Hideaki Miyamoto, Takashi Shono, Kotaro Waki, Masakuni Tateyama, Hideaki Naoe, Satoru Miyamaru, Daizo Murakami, Yorihisa Orita, Jun Morinaga and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenshi MatsunoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6975-1521
Hideaki MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Takashi ShonoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kotaro WakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Masakuni TateyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Hideaki NaoeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Satoru MiyamaruDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Daizo MurakamiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yorihisa OritaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Jun MorinagaDepartment of Clinical Investigation (Biostatistics), Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yasuhito TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. ytanaka@kumamoto-u.ac.jp.
Ryosuke GushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JPSaiseikai Kumamoto Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for pharyngeal cancers. However, pharyngeal ESD is sometimes technically challenging because of the narrow and complex space in which to work. Traction is important to complete the procedure efficiently. Here, we report the technical details and efficacy of a new traction method for pharyngeal ESD using ring-shaped thread and grasping forceps.

methodsWe analyzed pharyngeal ESD performed between January 2016 and March 2021 at our Institute. We designated cases resected using ring-shaped threads "Group R" and those resected without ring-shaped threads as conventional "Group C", and compared the technical outcomes between them. Multivariate analysis and the inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method using propensity scores were adjusted by confounding variables.

resultsWe analyzed 89 lesions from 68 patients, of which 46 were in Group R and 43 in Group C. Median procedure time and median dissection speed were significantly shorter in Group R than C (37 min vs. 55 min, and 16.0 mm

conclusionsThe traction method using ring-shaped thread increases the efficiency of pharyngeal ESD. This simple new traction method should be a useful option for pharyngeal ESD.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionTractionHumansPharynxSurgical InstrumentsTreatment OutcomeDissection speedEndoscopic submucosal dissectionPharyngeal cancerRing-shaped threadTraction

Identifiers

PMID36456753
OpenAlexW4310516591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.