Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456680›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2023

Development of the Inclination Toward Conscientious Objection Scale for Physicians.

Şükrü Keleş, Osman Dağ, Murat Aksu, Gizem Gülpinar, Neyyire Yasemin Yalım

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Şükrü KeleşDepartment of Medical History and Ethics, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. kelesukru@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2867-4608
Osman DağDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1750-8789
Murat AksuDepartment of Medical History and Ethics, School of Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4877-6081
Gizem GülpinarDepartment of Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-1235
Neyyire Yasemin YalımTurkish Bioethics Association, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3612-1704
Gazi University · TRHacettepe University · TRKaradeniz Technical University · TRManisa Celal Bayar University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable scale to assess whether a physician is inclined to take conscientious objection when asked to perform medical services that clash with his/her personal beliefs. The scale, named the Inclination toward Conscientious Objection Scale, was developed for physicians in Turkey. Face validity, content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity of the scale were evaluated in the development process. While measuring criterion-related validity, Student's t-test was used to identify the groups that did and did not show inclination toward conscientious objection. There were 126 items in the initial item pool, which reduced to 42 after content validity evaluation by five experts. After necessary adjustments, the scale was administered to 224 participants. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to investigate factor structure. The split-half method was employed to assess scale reliability, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient was calculated. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was used to estimate the internal consistency of the scale items. The distinctiveness of the items was evaluated using Student's t-test. The lower and upper 27% groups were compared to assess the distinctiveness of the scale. The items were loaded on four factors that explained 85.46% of the variance: "Conscientious Objection - Medical Profession Relationship," "Conscientious Objection in Medical Education and Medical Practice," "Conscientious Objection with regard to the Concept of Rights" and "Conscientious Objection - Physician's Professional Identity and Role." The final scale has 40 items, and was found to be valid and reliable with high internal consistency.

Indexed as

PhysiciansRefusal to TreatConscienceFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsConscientious Refusal to TreatEthics – MedicalRight to Health

Identifiers

PMID36456680
OpenAlexW4310503871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.