Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456664›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Plant-mediated rifampicin treatment of Bemisia tabaci disrupts but does not eliminate endosymbionts.

Milan Milenovic, Antoine Gouttepifre, Michael Eickermann, Jürgen Junk, Carmelo Rapisarda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Milan MilenovicEnvironmental Research and Innovation Department (ERIN), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41, Rue du Brill, 4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg. milan.milenovic@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1540-5660
Antoine GouttepifreESA, L'École Supérieure Des Agricultures, 55, Rue Rabelais, B.P. 30748, 49007, Angers Cedex 01, France.
Michael EickermannEnvironmental Research and Innovation Department (ERIN), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41, Rue du Brill, 4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0001-6347-0278
Jürgen JunkEnvironmental Research and Innovation Department (ERIN), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41, Rue du Brill, 4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-2591-4509
Carmelo RapisardaDipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), Università Degli Studi di Catania, Via Santa Sofia 100, 95123, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0824-9797
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LUUniversity of Catania · ITÉcole supérieure des agricultures · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whiteflies are among the most important global insect pests in agriculture; their sustainable control has proven challenging and new methods are needed. Bacterial symbionts of whiteflies are poorly understood potential target of novel whitefly control methods. Whiteflies harbour an obligatory bacterium, Candidatus Portiera aleyrodidarum, and a diverse set of facultative bacterial endosymbionts. Function of facultative microbial community is poorly understood largely due to the difficulty in their selective elimination without removal of the primary endosymbiont. Since the discovery of secondary endosymbionts, antibiotic rifampicin has emerged as the most used tool for their manipulation. Its effectiveness is however much less clear, with contrasting reports on its effects on the endosymbiont community. The present study builds upon most recent method of rifampicin application in whiteflies and evaluates its ability to eliminate obligatory Portiera and two facultative endosymbionts (Rickettsia and Arsenophnus). Our results show that rifampicin reduces but does not eliminate any of the three endosymbionts. Additionally, rifampicin causes direct negative effect on whiteflies, likely by disrupting mitochondria. Taken together, results signify the end of a rifampicin era in whitefly endosymbiont studies. Finally, we propose refinement of current quantification and data analysis methods which yields additional insights in cellular metabolic scaling.

Indexed as

HalomonadaceaeHemipteraRickettsiaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifampinAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifampin

Identifiers

PMID36456664
PMCPMC9715664
OpenAlexW4310496103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.