Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456573›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2022

Safety and efficacy of HSP90 inhibitor ganetespib for neoadjuvant treatment of stage II/III breast cancer.

Julie E Lang, Andres Forero-Torres, Douglas Yee, Christina Yau, Denise Wolf, John Park, Barbara A Parker, A Jo Chien, Anne M Wallace, Rashmi Murthy and 39 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice in Spain: survey of patterns of use and oncologists' perceptions.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

49 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Julie E LangUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. LANGJ2@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-6124
Andres Forero-TorresUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Douglas YeeUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3387-4009
Christina YauUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1937-0859
Denise WolfUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
John ParkUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Barbara A ParkerUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
A Jo ChienUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Anne M WallaceUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Rashmi MurthyUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Kathy S AlbainLoyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, USA.
Erin D EllisSwedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, USA.
Heather BeckwithUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Barbara B HaleyUniversity of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, USA.
Anthony D EliasUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, USA.
Judy C BougheyMayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3820-3228
Rachel L YungUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Claudine IsaacsUniversity of Georgetown, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9646-1260
Amy S ClarkUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-6535
Hyo S HanMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.
Rita NandaUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-0876
Qamar J KhanUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6287-020X
Kristen K EdmistonInova Health System, Virginia, USA.
Erica Stringer-ReasorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Elissa PriceUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Bonnie JoeUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Minetta C LiuMayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-5232
Lamorna Brown-SwigartUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2076-5177
Emanuel F PetricoinGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, USA.
Julia D WulfkuhleGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, USA.
Meredith BuxtonUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Julia L ClennellUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Ashish SanilBerry Consultants, LLC, Austin, USA.
Scott BerryBerry Consultants, LLC, Austin, USA.
Smita M AsareQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, USA.
Amy WilsonQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, USA.
Gillian L HirstUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4502-0035
Ruby SinghraoUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Adam L AsareQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, USA.
Jeffrey B MatthewsUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Michelle MeliskoUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Jane PerlmutterGemini Group, Michigan, USA.
Hope S RugoUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6710-4814
W Fraser SymmansUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1526-184X
Laura J van 't VeerUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-8298
Nola M HyltonUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-1662
Angela M DeMicheleUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1297-4251
Donald A BerryBerry Consultants, LLC, Austin, USA.
Laura J EssermanUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-4568
University of California, San Francisco · USBerry & Associates (United States) · USQuantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative · USGeorge Mason University · USMayo Clinic · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USGemini Computers (United States) · USGeorgetown University · USInova Health System · USLoyola University Chicago · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USSwedish Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
The I SPY 2.2 TRIAL: Evolving to Imaging and Molecular Biomarker Response Directed Adaptive Sequential Treatment to Optimize Breast Cancer OutcomesP01CA210961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Nola M. Hylton-Watson · 2017 to 2026
$22.9M
Real-time In Vivo MRI Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Pre-Operative Treatment TrialsR01CA132870 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HYLTON-WATSON, NOLA M., NEWITT, DAVID C · 2008 to 2019
$4.8M
Quantitative Imaging for Assessing Breast Cancer Response to TreatmentU01CA225427 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HYLTON-WATSON, NOLA M. · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA210961NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132870NCI NIH HHS U01 CA225427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HSP90 inhibitors destabilize oncoproteins associated with cell cycle, angiogenesis, RAS-MAPK activity, histone modification, kinases and growth factors. We evaluated the HSP90-inhibitor ganetespib in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with high-risk early-stage breast cancer. I-SPY2 is a multicenter, phase II adaptively randomized neoadjuvant (NAC) clinical trial enrolling patients with stage II-III breast cancer with tumors 2.5 cm or larger on the basis of hormone receptors (HR), HER2 and Mammaprint status. Multiple novel investigational agents plus standard chemotherapy are evaluated in parallel for the primary endpoint of pathologic complete response (pCR). Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer were eligible for randomization to ganetespib from October 2014 to October 2015. Of 233 women included in the final analysis, 140 were randomized to the standard NAC control; 93 were randomized to receive 150 mg/m

Identifiers

PMID36456573
PMCPMC9715670
OpenAlexW4310710439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.