ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2022
Translation and validation into Portuguese of the international spinal cord injury pulmonary function basic data set.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious disabling syndrome, and the clinical picture depends on the level and extent of the injury. The International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and the American Spinal Cord Association (ASIA) have developed instruments (Data Sets) to assess the various aspects of the SCI. In 2012, the International SCI Pulmonary Function Basic Data Set was elaborated. It is composed of four questions and spirometry for the collection of lung function basic data.
objectiveThe objective was to translate and validate the International SCI Pulmonary Function Basic Data Set to the Portuguese language.
methodsThe entire methodology followed the recommendations of the ISCoS and ASIA. Two translations of the original version into Portuguese were performed, and after consensus among the translators, the Portuguese version was sent for back-translation. After back-translation and comparison with the original version, the final Portuguese version was obtained. For the second phase of the study, 30 SCI individuals were selected. Two interviewers applied the questionnaire in two distinct moments.
resultsAll results presented constant, excellent, or perfectly concordant data, except for the third question in the inter-rater comparison, where the Kappa coefficient showed value reasonable in the first interview and good in the second.
conclusionThe translation into Brazilian Portuguese of the "International SCI Pulmonary Function Basic Data Set" created a valid and highly reliable instrument, like the original without linguistic and cultural disagreements that allow its use in the evaluation of patients with SCI in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.