Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456365›Full record

ArticleJASA express letters2022

Variations in advertisement call modulations do not influence vocal interactions in bullfrog choruses.

Andrea Megela Simmons, Laura N Kloepper

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JASA express letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Megela SimmonsDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1353-8275
Laura N KloepperDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA Andrea_Simmons@brown.edu, Laura.Kloepper@unh.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4785-5279
Brown University · USUniversity of New Hampshire · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chorusing male bullfrogs naturally vary the number of modulations within their advertisement call notes. A field playback experiment investigated whether these variations affect males' evoked vocal responses. Vocal responses were quantified manually and automatically by quantifying acoustic energy. The numbers of calls, number of notes, latency of response, and detected-note acoustic energy did not vary significantly across playback stimuli for focal males or the entire chorus, suggesting that variations in modulation number do not carry relevant information to males. Future work can determine whether modulation cues may function in sexual selection and affect female response.

Indexed as

Sexual SelectionVocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsCuesFemaleMaleRana catesbeiana

Identifiers

PMID36456365
PMCPMC9667906
OpenAlexW4308472320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.