Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456021›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Rapamycin and inulin for third-dose vaccine response stimulation (RIVASTIM): Inulin - study protocol for a pilot, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial of dietary inulin to improve SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in kidney transplant recipients.

Julian Singer, Matthew Tunbridge, Griffith B Perkins, Tania Salehi, Tracey Ying, Huiling Wu, P Toby Coates, Steven J Chadban

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CD56Clinical & translational immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julian SingerKidney Node, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1855-3581
Matthew TunbridgeCentral and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Griffith B PerkinsSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tania SalehiCentral and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tracey YingKidney Node, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Huiling WuKidney Node, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
P Toby CoatesCentral and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Steven J ChadbanKidney Node, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia steve.chadban@health.nsw.gov.au.
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an increased risk of hospitalisation and death from COVID-19. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is our primary risk mitigation strategy, yet vaccine effectiveness in KTRs is suboptimal. Strategies to enhance vaccine efficacy are therefore required. Current evidence supports the role of the gut microbiota in shaping the immune response to vaccination. Gut dysbiosis is common in KTRs and is a potential contributor to impaired COVID-19 vaccine responses. We hypothesise that dietary fibre supplementation will attenuate gut dysbiosis and promote vaccine responsiveness in KTRs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Rapamycin and inulin for third-dose vaccine response stimulation-inulin is a multicentre, randomised, prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial examining the effect of dietary inulin supplementation prior to a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine in KTRs who have failed to develop protective immunity following a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine schedule. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to inulin (active) or maltodextrin (placebo control), administered as 20 g/day of powdered supplement dissolved in water, for 4 weeks prior to and following vaccination. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants in each trial arm that achieve in vitro neutralisation of live SARS-CoV-2 virus at 4 weeks following a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Secondary outcomes include the safety and tolerability of dietary inulin, the diversity and differential abundance of gut microbiota, and vaccine-specific immune cell populations and responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (approval number: 2021/HRE00354) and the Sydney Local Health District (SHLD) HREC (approval numbers: X21-0411 and 2021/STE04280). Results of this trial will be published following peer-review and presented at scientific meetings and congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001465842.

Indexed as

COVID-19Kidney TransplantationVaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesDysbiosisHumansInulinMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2SirolimusCOVID-19 VaccinesInulinSirolimusVaccinesCOVID-19IMMUNOLOGYNUTRITION & DIETETICSRenal transplantationTransplant medicineVIROLOGY

Identifiers

PMID36456021
PMCPMC9716412
OpenAlexW4310959740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.