Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36456004›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses post-vaccination in UK healthcare workers with pre-existing medical conditions: a cohort study.

Victoria Ward, Jia Wei, William Gordon, Eleanor Barnes, Susie Dunachie, Katie Jeffery, David Eyre, Anne-Marie O'Donnell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria WardNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jia WeiNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9621-529X
William GordonDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Eleanor BarnesNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Susie DunachieNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katie JefferyDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
David EyreDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK david.eyre@bdi.ox.ac.uk.
Anne-Marie O'DonnellNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBOpen Data Institute · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine antibody responses after the second vaccination in healthcare workers (HCWs) with underlying health conditions.

designCohort study.

settingOxford University Hospitals in the United Kingdom.

participantsHealthcare workers who had SARS-CoV-2 serological data available and received two SARS-CoV- 2 vaccinations. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Peak SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG responses after the second vaccination and associations with underlying health conditions and the estimated risk of severe COVID-19 using an occupational health risk assessment tool.

methodsWe used univariable and multivariable linear regression models to investigate associations between antibody levels and demographics (age, sex, ethnicity), healthcare role, body mass index, underlying health conditions, vaccination status, prior infection and the Association of Local Authority Medical Advisors COVID-age risk score.

results1635 HCWs had anti-spike IgG measurements 14-84 days after second vaccination and data on any underlying health conditions. Only five HCWs (0.3%), all on immunosuppressive treatment, (including four organ transplant recipients), did not seroconvert after second vaccination. Antibody levels were independently lower with older age, diabetes, immunosuppression, respiratory disorders other than asthma and markedly so in organ transplant recipients. Levels were independently lower in ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 recipients and higher following previous infection. HCWs with 'very high' COVID-age risk scores had lower median antibody levels than those with 'low', 'medium' or 'high' risk scores; 4379 AU/mL, compared with 12 337 AU/mL, 9430 AU/mL and 10 524 AU/mL, respectively.

conclusionsTwo vaccine doses are effective in generating antibody responses among HCWs, including those with a high occupational risk. However, HCWs with underlying health conditions, especially diabetes, immunosuppression and organ transplant, had lower antibody levels, and vaccine response monitoring may be needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralAntibody FormationBNT162 VaccineCohort StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulin GVaccinationAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineImmunoglobulin GCOVID-19EPIDEMIOLOGYOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID36456004
PMCPMC9716410
OpenAlexW4310949454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.