Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36455271›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical focus2022

Strategies, considerations, and recent advancements in the development of liquid biopsy for glioblastoma: a step towards individualized medicine in glioblastoma.

Megan M J Bauman, Samantha M Bouchal, Dileep D Monie, Abudumijiti Aibaidula, Rohin Singh, Ian F Parney

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Megan M J Bauman1Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester.
Samantha M Bouchal1Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester.
Dileep D Monie1Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester.
Abudumijiti Aibaidula3Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and.
Rohin Singh4Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona.
Ian F Parney2Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
Neurological Surgery · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Traning Program at Mayo ClinicT32GM065841 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KAUFMANN, SCOTT H, SCHIMMENTI, LISA A · 2003 to 2022
$5.8M
Network mechanisms and bioengineering of precision immunotherapies for glioblastomasF30CA250122 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MONIE, DILEEP DANIEL · 2021 to 2023
$125k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA250122NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGlioblastoma (GBM) is a devasting primary brain tumor with less than a 5% 5-year survival. Treatment response assessment can be challenging because of inflammatory pseudoprogression that mimics true tumor progression clinically and on imaging. Developing additional noninvasive assays is critical. In this article, the authors review various biomarkers that could be used in developing liquid biopsies for GBM, along with strengths, limitations, and future applications. In addition, they present a potential liquid biopsy design based on the use of an extracellular vesicle-based liquid biopsy targeting nonneoplastic extracellular vesicles.

methodsThe authors conducted a current literature review of liquid biopsy in GBM by searching the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Articles were assessed for type of biomarker, isolation methodology, analytical techniques, and clinical relevance.

resultsRecent work has shown that liquid biopsies of plasma, blood, and/or CSF hold promise as noninvasive clinical tools that can be used to diagnose recurrence, assess treatment response, and predict patient outcomes in GBM. Liquid biopsy in GBM has focused primarily on extracellular vesicles, cell-free tumor nucleic acids, and whole-cell isolates as focal biomarkers. GBM tumor signatures have been generated via analysis of tumor gene mutations, unique RNA expression, and metabolic and proteomic alterations. Liquid biopsies capture tumor heterogeneity, identifying alterations in GBM tumors that may be undetectable via surgical biopsy specimens. Finally, biomarker burden can be used to assess treatment response and recurrence in GBM.

conclusionsLiquid biopsy offers a promising avenue for monitoring treatment response and recurrence in GBM without invasive procedures. Although additional steps must be taken to bring liquid biopsy into the clinic, proof-of-principle studies and isolation methodologies are promising. Ultimately, CSF and/or plasma-based liquid biopsy is likely to be a powerful tool in the neurosurgeon's arsenal in the near future for the treatment and management of GBM patients.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaPrecision MedicineBiopsyHumansLiquid BiopsyProteomicscell-free DNAextracellular vesiclesGBMglioblastomaliquid biopsynoninvasive diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID36455271
PMCPMC9879623
OpenAlexW4310531618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.