Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36455239›Full record

SynthesisBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2023

Work as a social risk factor in pregnancy: A systematic review of screening practices related to working conditions and family leave among pregnant adults.

Julia M Goodman, Mina Colon, Erika K Cottrell, Jeanne-Marie Guise

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "How Do I Prepare for This?" Patient Perspectives on Providers' Employment-related Support During Pregnancy.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia M GoodmanOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-8697
Mina ColonOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Erika K CottrellDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0481-4485
Jeanne-Marie GuiseDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health & Preventive Medicine, and Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Scholars in Women's Health Research Across the LifespanK12HD043488 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MYATT, LESLIE · 2002 to 2023
$10.4M
WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH SCHOLARS PROGRAMK12HD001256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI EVANS, ARTHUR T · 1998 to 2008
$3.2M
Oregon BIRCWH: Scholars in Women's Health Research Across the LifespanK12AR084221 · NIAMS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLIE MYATT · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS K12 AR084221NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001256NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaid family leave and working conditions are components of employment quality-a key social determinant of health across the life course, particularly during pregnancy. Increased research on prenatal social risk screening has not extended to employment quality. The objective of this systematic review was to identify prenatal screening practices and interventions in health care settings that address employment and working conditions as social risk factors among pregnant adults and to describe their properties and key findings.

methodWe searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO, SocINDEX, EMBASE, and the SIREN Evidence and Resource Library for studies published through February 14, 2022. We selected multiple search terms related to four domains: (1) employment or working conditions; (2) screening; (3) health care settings; and (4) pregnancy or maternal health.

resultsOf the 2317 unique titles and abstracts that were potentially relevant, eight articles met all inclusion criteria and focused on pregnant populations. The content of identified screening practices varied substantially, highlighting the multiple ways employment is conceptualized as a potential risk factor. Few studies included multidimensional measures of employment to assess working conditions, which may be particularly relevant during pregnancy.

conclusionsOur review suggests that screening for employment as a social risk factor does not regularly occur in prenatal care. Although pragmatic properties of the screening tools we assessed are promising, tools seldom examine the multidimensional nature of work. Understanding the principal intent of screening for employment prenatally could provide greater opportunity to collect and interpret contextual factors that influence how both providers and patients respond to social risk.

Indexed as

EmploymentWorking ConditionsAdultFamily LeaveFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk Factorspaid family leaveprenatal caresocial determinants of healthsocial risk screeningworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID36455239
PMCPMC9992310
OpenAlexW4310528224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.